To: lurqer who wrote (26204 ) 8/24/2003 3:38:35 AM From: lurqer Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467 For the moment forget the grand policy of world hegemony, and just concentrate on the ME strategy of the neo-cons. The invasion and occupation of Iraq was supposed provide us with a base in the ME from which we were going to change the whole ME dynamic. Government after government was going to be intimidated into “mending their ways”. Etc., etc. etc. In particular, the “Palestinian problem” was going to finally become tractable. We even had the Road Map ceremony. Now that Hamas has told Sharon/Bush what they can do with their map, the Likudniks say it’s time to eliminate Hamas. Hence,US President George Bush called upon all nations supportive of peace in the Middle East to recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation and to take all appropriate actions to deny it support. fromchannelnewsasia.com The irony here is that if the Iraqi invasion had never been attempted, we would still have the world’s sympathy and support in a fight against terrorism. That coupled with the bus bombing might well have been sufficient to have achieved agreement on freezing Hamas assets. But to gain leverage against Hamas (and for other ends) we did invade. In the process offending much of the world, and particularly, part of Europe. Will they now cooperate on the asset freeze? We’ll find out.Hamas calls on EU to rebuff U.S. demands for freezing of funds fromsfgate.com At this juncture, I’m making no predictions on the freeze, except to say that if the Europeans decide not to cooperate, or to provide only a sham cooperation, the War on Terror will have suffered a defeat. And it would be a defeat that stems directly from the decision to invade Iraq – producing exactly the opposite result from what the neo-cons predicted. JMO lurqer