SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (5846)8/24/2003 8:58:57 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 793563
 
True, true, but you still need a PhD and knowledge of the right buzzwords.

On the last point, it's clear however opinionated Bill is, he is a fast learner. He would get the buzzwords quickly. And he thinks his political views would disqualify him. I hate to tell him that most faculty coffee groups I've seen have at least one or two like him. As for the PhD, seems we've had our share of faculty members over the years who faked that.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (5846)8/24/2003 11:49:13 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793563
 
I was posting about the build up of the Iraqi forces. Here is an article on that from the "Times."

[The New York Times]
August 25, 2003
U.S. to Send Iraqis to Site in Hungary for Police Course
By DEXTER FILKINS

BAGHDAD, Iraq, Aug. 24 - Eager to have more Iraqis take responsibility for their country's security, American officials here are planning to ferry as many as 28,000 Iraqis to Eastern Europe for an intensive police training course.

Bernard B. Kerik, a former New York City Police commissioner in charge of the Iraqi Interior Ministry, said in an interview that American officials had secured permission from the government of Hungary to set up a large police academy inside an old Soviet military base there.

Mr. Kerik said the extraordinary measures were necessary because the existing police academies in Iraq were not large enough to train that many officers in the next several months.

His plan is part of a larger effort by senior American officials here to press the Iraqis to take a greater share in running the country. The Bush administration is also under growing political pressure at home to lighten the load on the American forces here.

"We want to turn Iraqi security over to the Iraqis," Mr. Kerik said. "This is the only way to do it quickly."

He said the prospective Iraqi officers would receive eight weeks of intensive training by Americans in Hungary and then return to Iraq. Early this year, the site was also used to train a group of Iraqi volunteers to work with American troops.

After the men return from training, they would be given four to six months of on-the-job instruction, similar to the training officers undergo in the United States.

Mr. Kerik said he hoped to begin training the first group of 1,500 officers in four months, with 28,000 officers ready to start work in Iraq over the next 18 months. That would bring the total number of police officers to 65,000 ? the number that American officials believe is required to police the country effectively.

The program outlined by Mr. Kerik reflects the growing sense of urgency among American officials that the chaotic security situation prevailing in some parts of the country could be more effectively dealt with by the Iraqis, who are seen as more credible peacekeepers than the American occupation forces.

There has been some violence against Iraqis who worked with the Americans, including a bombing in early July near the graduation ceremony for the first class of police recruits that killed seven of them. But Mr. Kerik said the overwhelming reason for planning training outside of Iraq was to train police officers as quickly as possible.

He said it would relieve American troops of the burden of doing the policing. But it is unclear whether that would reduce the number of American troops needed in Iraq.

Four months after Saddam Hussein's government collapsed, the streets of some Iraqi cities, including Baghdad, are still quite chaotic, with rampant robberies, kidnappings and shootings often going unpunished. The collapse of public order that followed the fall of Mr. Hussein's government was made worse by the disintegration of the Iraqi Army, which made guns and munitions easily available on the streets.

In Baghdad, for instance, American soldiers have set up checkpoints dedicated almost exclusively to stopping armed carjackings.

Since the end of the war, American administrators have put 37,000 police officers in place around the country. Most of them worked for the former government but were judged by the occupation officials after individual reviews to be competent, honest and reasonably independent from that government, Mr. Kerik said.

He said as many as 3,000 Iraqi officers had been barred from returning to police work, usually because of a history of corruption or brutality, which Iraqis say was common under the old administration.

Each of the officers now working in Iraq has been given a mandatory American-devised training course, usually lasting a few weeks, in police tactics, democracy and human rights. Mr. Kerik said that the pool of former officers was all but tapped out, though, and that raw recruits would need far more training.

Training those new recruits in Iraq's existing police academies would take nearly six years, he said.

Mr. Kerik, who is wrapping up his tour in Iraq, said he hoped that if the first class could begin training in four months, another group of 1,500 would begin training four weeks later. The course would last about eight weeks, he said, which is shorter than most police academies in Western countries, which typically last several months. "We don't have that luxury," he said.

He said the police academy would be set up in Hungary in the same site where hundreds of Iraqi volunteers received military training to join American forces in the invasion of Iraq. That training took place on a base near the city of Taszar.

The Iraqi police force has been given a largely warm reception by the Iraqi people, although it has been weakened by a lack of equipment, especially guns. In the southern Iraqi city of Diwaniya, for instance, only a fraction of the city's 2,500 police officers have guns. American marines overseeing the police have been forced to pair officers with guns with those who have none.

Mr. Kerik, acknowledging the equipment shortage, said that a shipment of 50,000 9-millimeter pistols would arrive shortly, and that 100,000 more would arrive next year.

He outlined progress in putting Iraqi border guards and customs officers in place as well. About 13,600 are on the job, he said, with about 6,000 more still to be hired and trained. American officials are also overseeing the creation of an Iraqi civil defense force, which would have about 14,000 members initially, under current plans.

Mr. Kerik, whose time here is to end in a week, said he was proud of what he had accomplished, including putting together a team of Iraqis who could serve as senior administrators for the new Interior Ministry.

He said said that although he would be returning to the United States, he expected to be engaged for some time in helping his successors.

"I'll probably be on the phone for several weeks," he said.

nytimes.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (5846)8/25/2003 3:53:16 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793563
 
Reason Blog

Another Asinine Acronym

Wired News reports on draft legislation of the "Vital Interdiction of Criminal Terrorist Organizations Act of 2003, or Victory Act."

Authored by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), the Victory isn't just the latest asinine legislative acronym to come down the pike (the USA PATRIOT ACT, you'll recall, stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act.) The bill, Wired News points out,

...includes significant portions of the so-called Patriot Act II, which faced broad opposition from conservatives and liberals alike and embarrassed the Justice Department when it was leaked to the press in February.

The Victory Act also seems to be an attempt to merge the war on terrorism and the war on drugs into a single campaign. It includes a raft of provisions increasing the government's ability to investigate, wiretap, prosecute and incarcerate money launderers, fugitives, "narco-terrorists" and nonviolent drug dealers. The bill also outlaws hawalas, the informal and documentless money transferring systems widely used in the Middle East, India and parts of Asia.
...

Critics say the bill is an opportunistic attempt to link the fight against drugs to the fight against terrorism by creating a new crime called "narco-terrorism." According to the draft, narco-terrorism is the crime of selling, distributing or manufacturing a controlled substance with the intent of helping a terrorist group.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (5846)8/25/2003 4:47:45 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793563
 
Good example of an Editor trying to dance and justify not calling a terrorist a "terrorist".

orlandosentinel.com

COMMENTARY: MANNING PYNN

Militant or terrorist: Judging the news
Manning Pynn

August 24, 2003

When the Sentinel mentions al-Qaeda, the organization held responsible for destroying the World Trade Center towers and damaging the Pentagon, it refers to "terrorists."

When the newspaper writes about Islamic Jihad and Hamas, which bragged of blowing up a Jerusalem bus this past week, it refers to "militants."

Jeffery Cabaniss of Cocoa thinks all three are "terrorist" organizations. "I believe that it is impossible to accurately use the word 'militant' to describe Hamas," he wrote Friday. "They are not engaging in 'combat' when they sneak up on a bunch of civilians and kill them without warning."

Cabaniss, a Christian supporter of Israel, is not alone in that belief. Similar messages -- one from Daniel Coultoff, chair of the Jewish Federation of Greater Orlando's community relations committee -- prompted the Sentinel's style committee earlier this year to review the use of those two words.

In April, the committee adopted this standard: "Use caution when using these terms [militants, terrorists], which can show bias toward one side in a conflict. Generally, 'bombers,"attackers' or 'suicide bombers' are preferred terms."

The term "terrorist" certainly expresses judgment: It imputes to the person or organization being described the motive of trying to instill fear. "Militant" seems to me much more neutral. And that may be why the Sentinel, despite its style committee's decision, continues to use that term to describe Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

Most of the news organizations I surveyed do the same.

I'm afraid that the horse is out of the barn on the labeling of al-Qaeda. Although journalists strive to avoid expressing bias in reporting the news, the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, so shocked Americans -- including the news media -- that they almost universally applied the term "terrorism" to what had happened. I don't think the Sentinel will retreat from that.

Does that mean, though, that we should extend that judgment to all attacks on civilians?

Sami Qubty, president of the Arab-American Community Center of Central Florida, doesn't think so.

A pacifist Palestinian who holds dual American and Israeli citizenship, he contends that the suicide bombers -- whose tactic he abhors -- differ from al-Qaeda in this regard: "They're resisting occupation."

Qubty acknowledged that suicide bombings resemble terrorism but likened them to the actions of Israelis "when they go out and shoot a missile and kill innocent bystanders."

By that standard, of course, any nation at war could be labeled "terrorist" when attacks take civilian lives.

And that raises another element that distinguishes the Sept. 11 attacks and the Middle East conflict: The United States was not at war when it was attacked; Israel and the Palestinians have been engaged in armed conflict for decades.

I won't presume to resolve the Middle East crisis here. It is tragic and involves acts I regard as terrorism.

But my belief -- and those of others who recoil at the violence -- doesn't warrant further injecting judgmental terms into impartial news reporting.