SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Western Digital (WDC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (10710)8/25/2003 2:11:24 PM
From: Alastair McIntosh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11057
 
Hi Sarmad. I don't think that an event causing an 8 cent hit to past earnings with no effect on future earnings explains a loss of $1.00/share in value. Or maybe I'm too logical.

Al



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (10710)8/26/2003 11:40:42 AM
From: Sam Citron  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 11057
 
What most troubles me is now that WDC is in the head business it has to fight the areal density war, and it is an expensive one. Can commodity margins generate enough profits to pay for this research? IBM must not have thought so. What I need to figure out, when I have the time, is the place of HDDs in a NAS SAN iSCSI world. Maybe someone here can help?



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (10710)8/26/2003 3:03:42 PM
From: Sam Citron  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11057
 
What do you expect to hear in tomorrow afternoon's cc?



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (10710)8/27/2003 1:38:44 PM
From: Sam Citron  Respond to of 11057
 
RE: Litigation Settlement

It certainly does appear that Cirrus got what they wanted. Contrast the result with WDC claim: wdc.com{E21EB6CE-B819-409D-AF88-F445BBEDC696}

Wonder if the sour experience with their read chip supplier was part of WDC's decision to vertically integrate.