Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (2169)	8/25/2003 6:06:56 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

"The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitution Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship." Congressman John R. Rarick "The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government." Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR for 16 years The late Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton's mentor), Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the CFR, stated in his book, "Tragedy & Hope": "The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established." **************************** Excerpts from "Global Tyranny...Step by Step" By William F. Jasper Quote from "Foreign Affairs", the journal published by the Council on Foreign Relations There is going to be no steady progress in civilization or self-government among the more backward peoples until some kind of international system is created which will put an end to the diplomatic struggles incident to the attempt of every nation to make itself secure....The real problem today is that of world government. Phillip Kerr (CFR), December 1922 Foreign Affairs There is no indication that American public opinion, for example, would approve the establishment of a super state, or permit American membership in it. In other words, time - a long time - will be needed before world government is politically feasible...This time element might seemingly be shortened so far as American opinion is concerned by an active propaganda campaign in this country.... Allen W. Dulles, 1946 Foreign Policy Association There is no longer a question of whether or not there will be world government by the year 2,000. As I see it, the questions we should be addressing to ourselves are: how it will come into being - by cataclysm, drift, more or less rational design - and whether it will be totalitarian, benignly elitist, or participatory....the probabilities being in that order. (emphasis added) Saul H. Mendlovitz, 1975 director World Order Models Project "A major obstacle to alerting Americans about plans to cancel our national sovereignty and personal freedoms and to submerge the US in a world government is the dissembling double-talk and outright lying routinely employed by the world government advocates. While groups like Planetary Citizens, the World Federalist Association, the Association of World Citizens, the Committee to frame a World Constitution, the World Constitution and Parliament Association, the World Association for World federation, etc, have usually flown their world government flags openly, the Council on Foreign Relations and other Establishment groups seeking world government prefer to obfuscate their aims with terms like "collective security," "the rule of law", "global institutions," "interdependence," and "world order." "As we have already shown and will further demonstrate, the CFR and it's influential members are also on record favoring and promoting world government. However, most of these public CFR utterances have appeared in publications and speeches intended for a select, sympathetic audience where the new world order adepts can "unblushingly" (in the words of Lincoln Bloomfield) contemplate and discuss "world government." "World government is not a subject to which most Americans, or other people of the world for that matter, give much serious thought. However' if John Q citizen does become cognizant of and disturbed about the threat of an emerging global leviathon, and if he expresses this concern to his congressman, and senators, or local newspaper editor, he either meets with derisive charges that he is chasing chimera, or he is provided with solemn denials that plans for world government are even being considered."