Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rascal who wrote (112781)	8/25/2003 9:17:55 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

with Nato and the UN. Responsibility for 95% of the troops, 95% of the bills and 100% of decisions is a bad strategy. Well, with NATO anyway. The war against Serbia Clark commanded was not a UN authorized war. And regarding the US share fo the military burden there, I'm guessing 95% might not be a bad estimate.

To: Rascal who wrote (112781)	8/25/2003 9:35:10 PM
From: quehubo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

<<General Clark is willing to share decision making and power with Nato and the UN.>> You mean he would rather place the security of the USA in the hands of Syria, Libya and et al at the UN? The UN is a complete farce a pitiful charade. Just ask Saddam he knows as well as all of our enemies. I am sure they are quite amused at the farce called the UN.