Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: muzosi who wrote (174508)	8/26/2003 2:25:29 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1580034

The reality is that Fox was on sound legal ground and the judge was wrong. if there was ever one single post from which showed how deranged your mind is, this should be it. i am not even sure whether we live in the same country under the same laws. the judge said it best about the lawsuit "wholly without merit, both factually and legally" Conservatives are never wrong.......its as simple as that.

To: muzosi who wrote (174508)	8/26/2003 8:41:38 AM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1580034

i am not even sure whether we live in the same country under the same laws. the judge said it best about the lawsuit "wholly without merit, both factually and legally" The judge was wrong. Franken is capitalizing on the trademarked ad slogan of another business -- one which has spent substantial sums of money to create that slogan. Franken STOLE the ad slogan of Fox News. What legal principle gives Franken the right to do this? You can damned well bet if he'd used "Just Do It" on the cover of his book he'd have been sued. Or "The Pause that Refreshes". And he would have lost.

To: muzosi who wrote (174508)	8/26/2003 9:36:30 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580034

if there was ever one single post from which showed how deranged your mind is, this should be it. i am not even sure whether we live in the same country under the same laws. the judge said it best about the lawsuit "wholly without merit, both factually and legally" Actually he went beyond saying that the suit was without merit... The judge also said he thought it ironic that a media company that should be fighting to protect free speech would seek to undermine the First Amendment. . This judge obviously does not watch the Faux News channel very much... <gg> Al