SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (174523)8/26/2003 9:57:54 AM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579973
 
This is BS. But I'm waiting on someone to tell me what is the legal basis for this nitwit judge's conclusion? Would he have seen it
the same way had the plaintiff been Nike, Coke, or any other company with an ad slogan they want to protect? Of course not; they're
not news organizations attempting to balance liberal extremism.


The first amendment protects freedom of speech, unless Franken slanders, which apparently he did not do or you can bet that Faux News would attack him on that basis. As I understand it, the main claim of the suit contended that readers could construe from the cover that Franken worked or represented Faux News. <gg>

Al



To: i-node who wrote (174523)8/26/2003 12:11:50 PM
From: muzosi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579973
 
they're not news organizations attempting to balance liberal extremism

with conservative extremism. so fox is not "fair and balanced" afterall; they have an extreme agenda which is i am sure exactly the way you like it.