Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (448312)	8/26/2003 2:17:49 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

First, I am not aware of China harboring terrorists. Second, we have no reason to invade a cooperative country, such as Indonesia, which is not "harboring" terrorists, but is fighting them. Third, yes, if it were practical, I would say invade North Korea or Syria right now. But there are reasons to take a more diplomatic approach, reasons which did not apply in the case of Iraq......

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (448312)	8/26/2003 2:19:32 PM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I wasn't aware of terrorists in China attacking U.S. interests. North Korea is likely clear as well. Saudi Arabia is cracking down on militants. Indonesia is also actively working to curb militants. Syria and Iran are not. There is no coincidence that Iraq has a border with these two fugitive countries. Iraq furthers the war on terror by providing such a border with these two countries. SH was also a genocidal death camp operator and repeated U.N. resolution offender. The Phillippines are also actively going after militants attacking them. Do you see the difference finally?