SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (6195)8/28/2003 3:23:47 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 794358
 
Call renewed to pare down the GOP field

Schwarzenegger suggests 2 rivals should quit race

By John Marelius
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

August 26, 2003

Arnold Schwarzenegger yesterday sought to nudge two high-profile Republican candidates out the recall door, saying their withdrawal from the race to replace Gov. Gray Davis would be "better for the party."

Hitting the conservative talk radio circuit for the first time as a candidate for governor, Schwarzenegger also sought to arrest the momentum of Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante, calling him a virtual clone of Davis, who faces removal from office in the Oct. 7 special election.

"It's like one newspaper pointed out, Bustamante is Gray Davis with a receding hairline and with a mustache. But it's the same person, the same philosophy," Schwarzenegger said on the Roger Hedgecock show on San Diego radio station KOGO.

A Los Angeles Times Poll published over the weekend showed Bustamante, the only prominent Democrat among the replacement candidates, running 13 percentage points ahead of Schwarzenegger in the race to replace Davis if he is removed.

Los Angeles businessman Bill Simon, the 2002 Republican nominee for governor, dropped out of the recall contest Saturday, saying there were too many Republicans in the race.

Schwarzenegger yesterday suggested state Sen. Tom McClintock of Thousand Oaks and former baseball commissioner Peter Ueberroth follow Simon's lead.

"I think mathematically speaking, it will be much better if they drop out. That's clear," he said.

"It's something that they have to decide for themselves, but it would definitely be better for the party," he added.

McClintock, appearing separately on the Hedgecock show, was asked if he would be the next to go.

"Oh, no. On the contrary, we've gone from an asterisk to double digits in the span of just a few weeks," he said. "And if Bill Simon's supporters rally to my campaign, we're in a statistical dead heat with Arnold.

"Arnold, despite unprecedented media attention, has been dead in the water since he entered the race. He has been in the low 20s in all the polls that have been published."

In Sacramento, Ueberroth, a registered Republican who is campaigning as an independent, said he isn't going anywhere either.

"The polls today won't be the polls at the time of the election," said Ueberroth, who was chief organizer for the 1984 Olympics in Los Angeles.

"There will be enough people who will understand the depth of the problems for this state and then they will go into the voting booth and make a decision (on) who is the person who can best get us out of this problem. I think enough of them are going to say I'm the candidate."

Schwarzenegger, who had said he would not attack fellow candidates, made the case yesterday that Bustamante was no better equipped to deal with the state's fiscal crisis than Davis.

"When you think of Gray Davis, you have to also think at the same time Bustamante," he said. "Because it's one team. One cannot say, 'Well, I had nothing to do with that mess,' because they both are together."

McClintock agreed. "I cannot imagine the people of California are going to vote to recall this governor for policies that have bankrupted our state and then turn right around and elect another Democrat to carry on precisely those same policies," he said. "That's just not rational behavior."

The governor and lieutenant governor, unlike the nation's president and vice president, are elected independently and do not run as a team.

Bustamante consultant Richie Ross said Schwarzenegger was "not being fair or completely honest."

"He chose Pete Wilson to chair his campaign. Does that mean that he agrees with all of the former governor's policy positions, including signing the largest tax increases in the history of California?" Ross told The Associated Press.

McClintock took a similar tack when he assailed Schwarzenegger as being vague on issues and refusing to take an ironclad "no-new-taxes" pledge.

"It does disturb me that Arnold's posture on taxes is identical to what Pete Wilson postured in 1990," he said. Republican Wilson sponsored what was then the state's largest tax increase to balance the budget during the recession of the early 1990s.

Schwarzenegger reiterated yesterday that while he opposes raising taxes, he wouldn't rule it out in the event of a natural disaster or terrorist attack.

Ueberroth said he would call the Legislature back into session as soon as he takes office to begin work on a long-term solution to the state's financial troubles.

"Democrats and Republicans tell us the current budget is balanced, but already analysts are forecasting an $8 billion to $10 billion deficit by the end of the next fiscal year," Ueberroth said. "We think it could be worse and we can't afford to wait."

He called on the Legislature to place a spending cap proposal on the March ballot so it could be in place in time for the next state budget. Ueberroth also said he will ask legislators to forgo fund-raising during the special session, and in subsequent years until after a budget is approved.

"This recall is a mandate for change," he said. "Accepting these fund-raising limitations is a chance for legislators to show the voters they've heard the message."

Also yesterday, the 25 state Senate Democrats, who previously had simply opposed the recall, voted unanimously to expand their position to include a "yes" vote for Bustamante in case Davis is voted out.

"We feel that from the standpoint of Democrats, and from the standpoint of what we care about, having two bites of the apple is infinitely better than having one," said Senate President Pro Tempore John Burton, D-San Francisco.

The original Democratic strategy of protecting Davis by clearing the recall field of credible Democratic candidates was shattered by Bustamante's late entry into the race. Democratic solidarity has further eroded as some elected officials and interest groups have endorsed Bustamante as an insurance policy in case Davis is ousted.

Several labor unions, including the powerful California Teachers Association, have endorsed Bustamante along with opposing the recall. The California Labor Federation, the state's umbrella labor organization, will meet today in Manhattan Beach to decide whether to endorse Bustamante or stick with its original anti-recall game plan.

Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of former elected officials and two think tanks urged whoever emerges as governor after the Oct. 7 election to adopt a seven-point state budget reform. The group called for a two-year budget, a constitutional limit on spending and revenue, tax reform to ease revenue swings and aid local planning, performance reviews, procurement reforms, and "job-friendly" reforms of workers compensation and other programs.

The panel also said the governor and legislative leaders should appoint a 10-member commission to make politically sensitive decisions, much like a federal commission that recommends military base closures.



To: Sully- who wrote (6195)8/28/2003 5:49:53 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 794358
 
The Conservative Who Would Be Governor
Tom McClintock is running third in California, but he may be the one who determines the outcome of the race.
by Bill Whalen - The Weekly Standard
08/27/2003 8:00:00 AM

THE RECALL defies both tradition and traditional math.

Recent history shows that Republicans can't win statewide races in California. But thanks to recall, they have a shot on October 7. Every poll shows the GOP with the most support on the second half of the recall, yet the front-runner is a Democrat, Cruz Bustamante. That's because the Republican majority-plurality is divided among three candidates and a fourth fellow who dropped out over the weekend.

And the man who may hold the key to the election? For now, it's the candidate in third place: state senator Tom McClintock, the recall's conservative alternative.

McClintock is about as unlikely a "darling" as you'll find in California politics. He's not telegenic--he is seemingly incapable of cracking a smile on television, or even batting an eyelash for that matter. Nor is he well liked within the upper echelons of his party. Last fall, McClintock ran for state controller. Though he was the lone Republican and in a position to win his race, the California Republican party instead gave more than $1 million to Gary Mendoza, the GOP candidate for insurance commissioner, and nearly $350,000 to Republican state senator Bruce McPherson, who was running for lieutenant governor. McPherson lost by 550,000 votes; Mendoza, by 350,000 votes. McClintock fell a mere 17,000 votes short of victory.

Now, nearly 10 months after that election, McClintock has turned the tables on the Republican establishment. He doesn't have enough support to lead the recall field--take McClintock's best showing (12 percent, according to the Los Angeles Times), add half-to-two-thirds of the support from the now-departed Bill Simon, and at best McClintock runs at 15-20 percent. That's not enough to win, but it could condemn Arnold Schwarzenegger to a second-place finish and hand the race to Bustamante.

McClintock's appeal is that he's a conservative non-Arnold. Just listen to the voiceover on his newly released TV ad: "We must have a governor who knows every inch of this state government, and who stands willing to challenge the spending lobby that controls it." That's as much as shot at Schwarzenegger's credentials as it is at Democrats' lack of thrift. McClintock's ad also says: "California used to be the Golden State. Taxes were low. Jobs were plentiful. Tom McClintock was there." That's an appeal to older conservatives who voted for Proposition 13 back in 1978 and probably know little about Arnold's movies.

Indeed, much of the McClintock strategy is based on the premise that voters will choose a feisty legislator instead of a conciliatory actor/activist. If elected, McClintock has promised to slash bureaucracy, place a cap on state spending and outsource government services. He's promised to balance the state budget through executive fiat and ballot initiative, if need be. Them is fighting' words, in Sacramento.

Indeed, McClintock's record shows that he's anything but a go-along, get-along politician. As Dan Weintraub has pointed out in his always-informative California Insider blog, McClintock was one of only a handful of legislators who voted against higher retirement benefits for state employees and higher local government pensions, back in Gray Davis's first year in office. McClintock also was a "no" vote when the legislature handed state prison guards a 35-percent raise (Davis then received a whopping campaign contribution from the guards). The pension bill now costs California taxpayers more than $500 million a year and you can tack on another $600 million in annual debt for the sop to prison guards. Weintraub writes: "Both bills became law and today stand as monuments to the worst excesses of the Legislature and Gov. Gray Davis. They also could be exhibits A and B in McClintock's campaign . . . vivid examples of how things would be different if he won on Oct. 7."

Which leaves unanswered the question of how many Californians actually will hear McClintock's mess. As of Monday, the campaign reported $388,500 in contributions since jumping into the race. According to McClintock's finance director, they need $4 million "to run the race we want." But that's small potatoes in this recall, where an all-out campaign will cost somewhere in the neighborhood of $12 million for the 60-day race. Schwarzenegger's campaign is expected to spend $2 million a week on media buys alone.

McClintock does have a fallback position, and in California it's an emerging force: conservative talk radio. Nearly every major city in California has at least one show where McClintock and his message are welcome, and those shows run morning, noon, and night. California's radio talkers tend to be very conservative and very in sync with McClintock's politics.

It's not as big of a splash as heavy TV advertising, but it does keep McClintock in the news--and nipping at Schwarzenegger's heels. Here's further proof that talk radio's time has arrived in California: On Monday, Arnold was a guest on Roger Hedgecock's show in San Diego and the syndicated show hosted by THE DAILY STANDARD's Hugh Hewitt. Arnold was feisty, referring to a newspaper account which described Bustamante as "Gray Davis with a receding hairline and a mustache." And he linked himself to a former California governor: "Remember what Ronald Reagan said, 'America is the shining city on the hill.' I have experienced that thing firsthand."

What establishment Republicans hope is that McClintock bowing out of the race in a show of unity. But don't expect that until September 12, at the earliest. Why? The Republican state convention. McClintock could address the GOP faithful and say, rightly, that his message was received. And, that, for a change, his party listened.

Bill Whalen is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, where he follows California and national politics.

© Copyright 2003, News Corporation, Weekly Standard, All Rights Reserved.



To: Sully- who wrote (6195)8/28/2003 8:52:23 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 794358
 
ON THE MEDIA: How the Washington Post Editor sees dealing with the White House.

BOB GARFIELD: Many reporters, including your White House correspondent Dana Milbank - have complained almost since day one about access to the Bush administration. A White House that has been almost in the lock-down mode from day one. I'm just curious -- has the tenacity of your reporting on this issue caused you any problems in the ordinary course of covering the White House on other matters, routine and otherwise?

LEONARD DOWNIE: Not that I'm aware of. I mean I am aware that some of the officials-- whose utterances were closely examined in that article aren't happy about the way in which the article characterized, and they've made that clear to us. But you know in the larger scheme of things I think the pattern that we're seeing with this administration's relationship with the media is that they came here a close-knit group, almost entirely intact from Texas, and added on people like, say, Donald Rumsfeld as the Secretary of Defense who also believes with them in the discipline of message, and they had unusual success for a long time in enforcing that. I think as time goes by, under the strains of both domestic and foreign challenges and as the administration itself begins to change internally -- the departure of Karen Hughes to Texas, for example. There are feuds going on within the administration. There are differences of views. We're beginning to see the kind of seams, if you will, in their protective armor and that opens it up to more fact-finding by the media.

BOB GARFIELD: Not chaos yet in the White House.

LEONARD DOWNIE: Oh, no. I think that the disintegration of the Clinton Administration in its final years gave the media unusual opportunities within an administration that we had not seen for some time before then and probably won't see for some time in the future.
wnyc.org