Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (18375)	8/28/2003 7:39:24 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

bzzzzzzzz! Wrong. One thing about me is I never apologize. I am as big a moron about that as you are. So, with that, it I do say something to straighten the record out, is has to be true. That is the advantage of being an inflexible sob. You get to be half believed if you sharpen the point. If I were forever expliquing my complexity it would be ignorable as a ploy. I stand by my somewhat-murky-still, clarification. Energizer bunny was a wry comment on too-much-time-on-the-hands squirrelling away and holding forth of info-data on all manner of issuers, with a somewhat wryer comment on the price of these issuers, at least from my perspective. i.e. He does comment a lot of depth on stocks doesn't he? I mean if you asked about a russifer reco you would get a list of ten past presidents and their afterwork pastimes. A wonder, sans doot. Noting the paper price was more high-than-low optically subjectively, was merely saying what many say to me when I point out a mover -- "out of my price/leverage range". Nothing wrong with that. Now we will get a layered and nuanced defense of russ' multiple recordiae, ignoring the fact that I never implied that multiples cannot be achieved in paper over 2 dollars. I find it amazing that I may labour under direct appelation of the most scurrilous base nature and must maintain a cheerful mein, while being a paragon of fairness and decency to all concerned, yet with one mere sideways comment of total innocent nature par moi-meme, and the resident eminencea of the board and fan club demand, or seem to rigorously require the most scrupulous qualification. It is as if my motives were suspect. And I own not a share of any stock issued in the land! How odd. EC<:-}