Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (449920)	8/29/2003 10:50:06 AM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

You wrote:<font color=blue>"This is not wartime. That's another element in an exaggerated scenario that's intended to invalidate criticism and suppress dissent."<font color=black> Not wartime? Tell that to the families of the victims of 9/11 and to the families of our soldiers fighting and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan. You epitomize the average Democrat, who won't take the terrorist threat seriously until there is a mushroom cloud over Washington D.C.. You wrote:<font color=blue>"In case you haven't noticed, Bush is failing miserably."<font color=black> So far, Bush has been a very successful and effective leader. If Gore had been in office, I am positive that the Taliban and Al Qaeda would still own Afghanistan, Saddam would still be preparing WMD for use against America and Israel, and one or more American cities would have been attacked by terrorists. You wrote:<font color=blue>"Iraq is in an uproar and has become a cause celebre for the Islam world"<font color=black> America will roar louder. You are right, though. Iraq will be a cause celebre when it becomes a successful democracy. Will it take a long time, be costly and be painful. Yes it will. The cost of bringing freedom and democracy to the world is well worth it. You wrote:<font color=blue>"N. Korea is playing games with us and poses a serious threat to S. Korea;"<font color=black> Hmmm!? Now let me see...... Who was President when America decided to pay North Korea hundreds of millions of dollars in blackmail, if they would not develop nuclear weapons? Could it have been Clinton? Did Clinton announce to the American people that he was allowing America to be blackmailed by North Korea? Did Clinton make sure that America would benefit from allowing itself to be blackmailed? While Americans were paying hundreds of millions of dollars in blackmail (oil) payments to North Korea for not building nuclear weapons, Clinton was getting BJs in the White House, and North Korea WAS building nuclear weapons. What possibly could have been distracting Clinton from doing his job?

To: tejek who wrote (449920)	8/29/2003 11:06:42 AM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

You wrote:<font color=blue>"Bush angrily dismissed the UN and most of our important allies before the war and now they not available to help in the worsening crisis overseas"<font color=black> He dismissed the Unethical Nations (UN)? The UN is controlled by our enemies. Would you want America to give up it's sovereignty to the corrupt, mismanaged UN? Who were those important allies that are not available to help? France? France has been a backstabber against America way before Bush got into office. You wrote:<font color=blue>"and finally, our only significant ally left, T. Blair, Bush's poodle, is in serious trouble at home"<font color=black> America has other significant allies including Australia, Israel, Poland, and the other Eastern Bloc countries, among others. You refer to Blair as Bush's poodle because he was a strong supporter of America??? Let's see your logic. You insult a country (England) that acts as a friend to America and stands with America. But you admire a corrupt, antiAmerican organization like the Unethical Nations (UN). And....... you say that you aren't antiAmerica?