SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (26708)8/29/2003 9:48:50 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Drafting the General

______________________________

Wesley Clark isn't a candidate yet. But a cadre of online activists, captivated by the retired general, are doing everything they can to change that.

By Liv Leader
MotherJones.com
August 29, 2003


John Hlinko has been waiting for almost five months for Wesley Clark to make up his mind about running for president. He won't have to wait much longer.

Howard Dean has emerged as the unlikely early favorite in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination. But that nomination is 11 months away, and the contest could be in for a major shake-up next month -- when Clark will make his decision known.

The retired four-star general has been flirting with the idea of running for several months. That flirtation became a little more formal this week, as an anonymous friend of the former general told The New York Times that Clark 'wants to run.' Clark himself says he will make a final decision within a few weeks -- probably after the next campaign finance reporting deadline, which comes on Sept. 15.

For hundreds of grassroots supporters like Hlinko, that day can't come soon enough. In April, Hlinko put his political consulting business on hold and began organizing DraftWesleyClark.com -- one of three separate online campaigns to draft the former general as a candidate. None of the activists behind the sites (the others are DraftClark.com and DraftClark2004.com) are Clark confidants. In fact, Hlinko has met the retired general only once -- at the New Democrat Network conference.

"He was there and I just happened to see him. I went up and shook his hand, introduced myself. He was clearly impressed with what we're doing. Not reading a lot into it, he appeared really humble, and it was very refreshing."

Clearly, for Hlinko and the other folks behind DraftWesleyClark.com, the retired general is a man to believe in. As Hlinko put it, "he seemed to sort of wake this idealism in us that had been buried under heaps of cynicism."

Clark isn't a household name among most Americans, but he also isn't completely off the radar, either. He served as Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in the Kosovo war, he's appeared on CNN as a military analyst on many occasions, and he's emerged as a vocal critic of the administration's policy in Iraq. And, as Hlinko and others who want to see Clark run for the White House are eager to tell anyone who will listen, the retired general has the kind of backstory a campaign can be built on.

A military hero who was awarded a Purple Heart, Clark had to teach himself to walk again after being seriously injured in Vietnam. He's a family man, a father of one who's been married to his wife since 1967. He's worked as an investment banker, and speaks four languages. Hlinko rattles off the rest of the impressive biography: Top of his West Point Class; Rhodes Scholar; published author. Hlinko says he sees Clark as the kind of man who can get people excited about the election -- including moderate Republicans fed up with the Bush administration.

In fact, Hlinko has a case-study to back up his assertion. While he was getting DraftWesleyClark.com up and running in Washington, DC, his brother-in-law, Josh Margulies was busy starting Republicans for Clark in New York City. Margulies -- who says he bolted to the GOP after the Monica Lewinsky affair -- believes Clark's personal integrity will play will with Republicans.

"You could not create on paper a better resume for a potential presidential candidate," Margulies insists. "Every time someone refers to something in the military which is mind bogglingly impressive, there's always something in the civilian life that matches. It's the entire package."

It's not just Hlinko and Margulies who think drafting Clark is worth giving up their day jobs. Local Clark for President groups have sprung up across the country. DraftClark.com lists no less than 40 such grassroots organizations, including Students for Clark, Veterans for Clark, Women4Clark, and Hispanics for Clark. The last is the creation of Yosem Companys, a doctoral student at Stamford. Since early July, Companys has been using contacts he established as a community organizer to get the word out about Clark. And, like Hlinko, Companys says that Clark is attracting Hispanic supporters from both parties.

Of course, Clark has yet to speak directly about most key campaign issues. But that doesn't seem to be a major concern for Companys, Hlinko, Margulies, and the other Draft Clark activists, they are so taken with his character. In fact, character is what all three repeatedly cite when asked what drew them to support Clark.

"I agree with his approach and I feel that on an issue I haven't considered, or that we haven't had the chance to consider, I trust that [Clark] would do the right thing," Margulies says.

Both Hlinko and Margulies like to say that Clark is the kind of president they were promised as kids. As Margulies puts it, "Clark just has this manner about him, you look at his record and you say 'this man is just built on integrity and courage and service.' You could just go to sleep at night knowing that you'd be taken care of."

From Clark's speeches and writings his advocates say they have determined that their main man is pro-choice, pro-affirmative action, pro-immigration, supports a progressive tax policy, is wary of the USA Patriot Act, doesn't support drilling in the Alaskan Wildlife Refuge, and supports a broad social safety net. But pinning a left/right political position on Clark is a little tricky, because the man likes to speak about big ideas -- which is exactly what everyone is so crazy about.

Several Washington pundits have suggested that Clark is better-suited to being a vice presidential candidate. His military record, upstanding character, and Southern roots could do much to round out a Democratic ticket, they assert. Still, Hlinko and the others hoping to draft Clark hope to see their man on the top line.

Already, Hlinko says, over 30,000 people have sent letters to the retired general through DraftWesleyClark.com, and the site has garnered over $900,000 in campaign pledges. That money will be essential if Clark decides to join the race. Dean, who recent polls show holding a commanding lead among likely voters in New Hampshire, raised more than $7 million through June and is reportedly well on the way to reaching the $10 million mark by the end of September. And Dean is on the offensive, attacking President Bush in a series of television ads airing in Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Washington state and Wisconsin.

In the meantime, Hlinko and the others hoping to draft Clark wait for the general.

"My guess is September is when things need to fall into place, where this really needs to shift into high gear. That being said, President Clinton didn't announce until October, and he did all right. So, you never know, it may not be as late as you think."

Liv Leader is a MotherJones.com editorial intern.

motherjones.com



To: GST who wrote (26708)8/29/2003 12:17:28 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
An interesting comment sent to General Clark in the last 2 hours...fyi...

<<...FirstName: Richard
LastName: Sciascia
City: APO
State: AE
Date: 08/29/2003
Time: 11:45 AM

Comments:
General Clark, America does need a new president, and probably more importantly, it needs a new administration. On Army posts, I have heard "Remember, a vote for a democrat, is a vote against Rumsfeld". In todays paper, it was anounced that President Bush will limit the pay raise, yet again, for civil service employees. His reason being that with the cost of the war on terrorism, he can not afford the planned raise. Civil Service workers understand that, but wonder why the mere 10 billion saved there (on a projected deficit of 480 billion), is the only bill payer for the war. The morale is at an all time low, and the important work done by these individuals seems to be ignored, and even worse, not appreciated at all. Factor this with the plans by the administration to "out source" hundreds of thousands of positions that these dedictaed civilians accomplish. "Out source" being another way of saying more Haliburton type contracts that benefit not the country, but some party donors and CEOs of major corporations. This has to be stopped, and I believe you have the moral bearing and integrity to do what is right for the country, not private stockholders. Please run for president, your service is needed. Sincerely, Richard Sciascia...>>

draftwesleyclark.com



To: GST who wrote (26708)8/29/2003 3:53:00 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Riding In On A White Horse?

theday.com

Published on 8/29/2003

Anew and interesting dimension has been added to the otherwise humdrum 2004 presidential race. Four-star retired Army general and former NATO commander Wesley K. Clark, has confided to friends he wants to run for the nation's highest post next year, The New York Times reported in its Thursday edition.

Good looking, charming, highly intelligent and articulate and with his distinguished military background that included service in Vietnam, he would be powerful contender among the current field of Democratic candidates. As his television appearances as a military expert during the Iraq war demonstrated, he handles himself well in speaking on complicated issues. He could easily outshine other contenders on national security matters. And nobody could accuse him of shirking his military duty.

There are already several Draft Clark committees at work. One has raised nearly $1 million. Gen. Clark could announce his intentions as early as next month, The Times report said.

One thing that might make it difficult to enter this late in the race is Gen. Clark's lack of an organization and campaign funds. However, that could quickly change, given the general's high visibility and stature and relative public indifference shown the other Democratic candidates.

At the very least, his entrance would be good for the Democrats, for it would generate some excitement in a race that has up to this point had trouble attracting attention. Even if he eschewed a presidential run, the general would be an asset to the Democratic ticket as a running mate.

His possible presence in the race provides something for President Bush and the Republicans to worry about.



To: GST who wrote (26708)8/29/2003 5:37:17 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (9) | Respond to of 89467
 
oh god is that ever an understatement GST.

Bush is the worst president we've had in 100 years. Its amazing really.



To: GST who wrote (26708)8/29/2003 7:09:11 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo...

talkingpointsmemo.com

(August 29th, 2003 -- 1:00 PM EDT // link)

There's a lot of buck-passing mumbo-jumbo afoot right now coming from the chief war-hawks. But I think we can already see the makings of what we might call the big buck-pass --- a 21st century version of the 'stab-in-the-back' charge German militarists used against the fledgling republic which replaced Kaiserdom in the aftermath of World War I.

It would go something like this: To the extent that we're facing reverses in Iraq, we're not facing them because the plan was flawed or incompetently executed. We're facing them because the plan was sabotaged - by its enemies at home.

The saboteurs were the folks at the State Department and the CIA who stymied effective collaboration with the pre-war Iraqi opposition and members of the defeatist press who have a) demoralized Americans by exaggerating the problems with the occupation of Iraq and b)encouraged the mix of jihadists and Baathists, by creating that demoralization, to keep up their resistance and bombing by giving them the hope that America can be run out of the country.

For my part, I doubt it'll work. But I think that's where we're going.

One other point: if you have any doubt that the new neocon line that we need to turn Iraq over to the Iraqis really means turn it over to Ahmed Chalabi and the INC, read this column today by Bernard Lewis in the Wall Street Journal.

Thus reads the key graf ...

Fortunately, the nucleus of such a government is already available, in the Iraqi National Congress, headed by Ahmad Chalabi. In the northern free zone during the '90s they played a constructive role, and might at that time even have achieved the liberation of Iraq had we not failed at crucial moments to support them. Despite a continuing lack of support amounting at times to sabotage, they continue to acquit themselves well in Iraq, and there can be no reasonable doubt that of all the possible Iraqi candidates they are the best in terms alike of experience, reliability, and good will. It took years, not months, to create democracies in the former Axis countries, and this was achieved in the final analysis not by Americans but by people in those countries, with American encouragement, help and support. Ahmad Chalabi and the Iraqi National Congress deserve no less.

Chalabi, Chalabi, Chalabi ...

-- Josh Marshall