Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (18832)	8/31/2003 6:39:31 AM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 39344

Well, you are omitting one vital fact. I have never so much as told you to buy or not buy a single stock. On the other hand I did routinely denigrate Canico in no uncertain terms. I still stand by my denigration. What I said about them never making it a mine and never getting their 500 million dollars is true. This will not happen. When Inco sucks 1.85 billion out of the Europeans to develop an Asian nickel mine, you can bet there will not be too much left over to build one in Brazil. And heaven forfend that any Brazilians will fork over for the mine. They know better. I never did mention what the market might make of it. The market is routinely fooled and routinely wrong. If it were totally efficient it would have known that Bre-X was salted. So did you ever buy, or in your case not buy any Cassidy in your travels since I was challenged and mentioned this some time back? If you had you would have bought at 26 cents and be holding at 58 today. Hardly what you would expect out of 100% fallible source. If any of your other contra-EC picks make it let me know. If it can be logically discerned by eminent reason that say a R.R. Mex gold hunter has an unassailably commercial property, just lay the facts on us, one by unimpeachable one. Fallibly yours, as always. EC<:-}