SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (6410)8/31/2003 9:25:39 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793809
 
That's like the Boston Globe coming out and sponsoring Kerry.

He's the "Hometown boy."



To: John Carragher who wrote (6410)9/1/2003 2:02:38 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793809
 
READ IT FOR YOURSELF
Cannibals
What is really being said about America in the Arabic press? Well read on.

Monday, September 1, 2003 12:01 a.m.

An extract from "May the Cannibals be Cursed!" by Fatma Abdallah Mahmoud, published recently in Al-Akhbar, an Egyptian government daily. That government has received nearly $60 billion in aid from the U.S. taxpayer since 1979.

According to the French Dictionnaire Larousse, cannibals are primitive, barbaric, blood-letting creatures from the prehistoric era. They lived by killing their human enemies, tearing their bodies apart, disemboweling them, taking apart their organs, gouging out their eyes, scalping their heads, and hanging their skulls at the entrance to their caves! After that, they would gobble their flesh while it was still raw. Only after they had completely digested them could they be certain they were dead!

[Larousse] adds to this "enjoyable" explanation that this was how the cannibals , who were barbaric creatures similar to beasts of prey, took vengeance upon their enemies. They would slaughter them, tear them limb from limb, and mutilate the corpses, exactly as the American forces did to the bodies of Saddam Hussein's two sons Uday and Qusay, whose distressing and shocking pictures were circulated by the world media.

Every place that it destroys, annihilates, and plunders treasure and oil [from], America does no less than what primitive cannibal tribes did in the prehistoric era!!

What is the meaning of the abhorrent crimes that America perpetrates in Iraq, Liberia, Afghanistan, Sudan, and Palestine via the Israeli angels of destruction? What is the meaning of the deeds carried out everywhere by the American forces--or to be more precise, by the children and grandchildren of the gangs of pirates and blood-letters who run [U.S.] policy?

Have they become beasts of prey, or bulls, barbaric, satanic, and unbridled, who tear apart bodies and destroy peaceful peoples?!

What is the meaning of this huge number of pictures in the news . . .that arouse horrified shock in our hearts? The body parts of the victims of American aggression against Iraq, torn and immersed in a pool of blood!! . . .In every country trampled by the feet of the American military forces, we see ghastly pictures of the remains of innocent civilian victims: eyes gouged out, noses cut off, limbs intentionally amputated with the flesh that covered them stripped off. I implore you to look at the pictures of Uday and Qusay, Saddam Hussein's two sons, who were horribly mutilated.

What happened to these American rulers--I refer to those descended from the original pirates, as this is their true and absolutely undeniable origin . . . . What happened to these "hero offspring"? Have they . . .reverted to their decaying and debased primeval state?! Have they surrendered to their weakness for murdering, crushing, and shedding the blood of innocent civilians and victims?!"

What is the meaning of this satanic force that makes them mutilate corpses, in a way so barbaric and loathsome--thus harming human dignity . . . and contravening the simplest of the rudiments of morality, humanity, and even military [ethics]?!! . . . The blood spilled in most of the countries of the free world--the hero Iraq, the courageous fighting African Liberia from which America seeks to remove French protection, and Afghanistan, whose poor and ordinary citizens gave the arrogant American forces a drink from the bitter [cup] of defeat and humiliation, [the same cup from which] they drank, to intoxication, in their war in Somalia. In addition, we must never forget the fierce whipping the Americans took in Vietnam; American military honor was dragged like a floor rag through the Vietnamese swamps!

The fight against America will be continued, Allah willing, by the peoples waging Jihad against the original pirates and criminals--or, to be more precise, against the cannibals and the human corpse-disembowelers!!
(Translated from the Arabic by the Middle East Media Research Institute.)

opinionjournal.com



To: John Carragher who wrote (6410)9/1/2003 4:25:24 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793809
 
Should we give California back to Mexico?

Latino vote key to recall victory, say experts
Most are expected to come out in favor of Bustamante
James Sterngold, Chronicle Staff Writer
Sunday, August 31, 2003
©2003 San Francisco Chronicle | Feedback

URL: sfgate.com

Los Angeles -- As CEO of a thriving, family-owned health care company, Ruth Lopez- Williams says she sympathizes with Republican efforts to slash regulations and taxes, and she expresses mixed feelings about how much Gov. Gray Davis has really helped entrepreneurs like herself.

But when asked about her views on the recall election, Lopez-Williams, who is also the chairwoman of the Latin Business Association in Los Angeles, is unequivocal: She says she and the other members of her organization are largely opposed to the recall because of the disruptions it would cause and, when forced to choose a replacement candidate, will throw their support overwhelmingly to Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante, the only well-known Democrat in the race.

"Davis has not necessarily been business-friendly in the long term," Lopez- Williams said. "Absolutely, we have some frustrations with him. But from the Latino perspective, we certainly view Davis as more friendly to our interests overall than the last governor. That's why I think, in the business community, Latinos are fairly united in their opposition to the recall and even more by support for Bustamante."

She is not alone. Many Republicans and some of the candidates have claimed that Latinos, the state's largest minority group, and particularly Latino entrepreneurs are just as disillusioned with Davis as they are. But experts who study Latinos and many Latino leaders say they anticipate that the community, which traditionally votes Democratic, will vote heavily against the recall and even more heavily in favor of Bustamante, who could become the first Latino governor in more than a century.

In fact, many experts say the Latino vote could hold the secret to this odd electoral exercise, enhancing the power of the Latino community significantly in the process. There are more than 130 candidates to replace Davis. Although only a handful are serious, the vote might well be fragmented, which means that the next governor might be chosen with as little as 20 percent to 30 percent of the vote.

The math has played right into the hands of this growing ethnic minority. If Latinos, who make up about 17 percent of the state's registered voters, turn out in great numbers and vote more or less as a bloc, in line with their registration, they could well be the factor that defines state politics on Oct.

7 and in the future.

"I don't think it's hyperbole," said Harry Pachon, president of the Tomas Rivera Policy Institute at the University of Southern California. "When people realize Bustamante has a real chance, it will tend to bring out Latino voters. Latinos could very well play a more important role this time than in any other election."

James Aguirre, head of the Mexican American Bar Association Political Action Committee, said his group has targeted this election as a major opportunity for Latinos to flex their political muscle. It plans to raise money to defeat the recall and support Bustamante. In addition, he said, his group and other Latino organizations are planning to spend heavily to defeat Proposition 54, which would prohibit the state from collecting data under most circumstances on the ethnicity of people using state services.

Some Republicans have rejected the notion that all Latinos will vote in tandem, but many also concede that the GOP has yet to organize an effective effort to win over more conservative Latino voters."I would view it as insulting to say they all vote in the same way, because they don't," said Ken Khachigian, a Republican consultant who helped get the recall on the ballot. "Like every taxpayer who relies on government services, they have suffered under this governor."

He added, "I don't see any candidate getting buried in some kind of Latino landslide."

In general, Latino voters have held traditional, slightly conservative views on social issues and more liberal views on state spending. Consequently, Democratic social programs hold great appeal, but Republicans also attract some businessmen and women as well as those who oppose abortion and favor school prayer.

The best bet for Republicans, then, is to appeal to Latino entrepreneurs. But even within the business community there appears to be a growing view that they should support Bustamante.

Roberto Barragan, president of the Valley Economic Development Center, a nonprofit organization that helps small businesses in the San Fernando Valley, expressed strong opposition to Davis because of what he said was his gutting of programs that benefited small business owners. But he said he believed Latino businessmen would largely vote in one direction, and that was likely to be in favor of Bustamante.

"It's less about Democrats and Republicans and more on ethnic lines," said Barragan.

Arnold Schwarzenegger has sought to appeal to Latinos and other minorities by speaking often of his experience as an immigrant from Austria struggling to build a life in this country. But, some experts say, he has harmed that appeal with his support in 1994 of Proposition 187, which would have denied state services for undocumented immigrants in the state.

In addition, some Latino groups have complained about Schwarzenegger's position on the advisory board of an organization called U.S. English, which promotes the designation of English as the official language, as opposed to bilingualism, which many Latinos support.

Sean Walsh, a spokesman for Schwarzenegger, said the candidate believes in the importance of English, especially for immigrants seeking to succeed, but that he has not been active in the group for some time and would resign if he is elected governor.

Barragan said he did not believe that the support for Proposition 187 would be a major factor among business people. A more important issue, he said, is Schwarzenegger's opposition to a bill that would allow undocumented immigrants to obtain driver's licenses. Latinos heavily support that effort.

In the gubernatorial election last November, Latinos voted 65 percent in favor of Davis and 24 percent for the Republican challenger, Bill Simon, according to a Los Angeles Times exit poll.

But those who are courting the Latino vote this time are taking no chances. Miguel Contreras, executive secretary-treasurer of the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, said that his union is planning everything from direct mail to door-to-door canvassing in opposition to the recall of Davis and in favor of Bustamante, focusing on Latinos.

He said that there are about 550,000 Latinos in the state regarded as highly likely to vote on Oct. 7, based on past voting patterns, leaving about 1.1 million Latino voters up in the air, a highly significant number if they can be energized and motivated to turn out.

"That is the group that will make the difference," said Contreras.