SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: unclewest who wrote (6542)9/2/2003 12:45:25 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793838
 
OJT in how to get to Guerillas and Terrorists. The Army should have got more advice at the start from the Israelis. They have years of experience doing this.

[The New York Times]
September 2, 2003
STRATEGY
G.I.'s Shift to More Precise, Smaller Raids
By ERIC SCHMITT

WASHINGTON, Sept. 1 - A new series of major raids in northern Iraq against supporters of Saddam Hussein's government and criminal operatives is the first wide-scale use of a revamped American strategy in which troops carry out more precise attacks instead of broad sweeps, American commanders say.

In the last week, several hundred troops from the Army's Fourth Infantry Division, supported by tanks and helicopters, have raided suspected guerrilla hideouts in a swath of territory north of Baghdad. Military officials have provided few details, citing continuing operations, but at least seven Iraqis suspected of carrying out attacks against American troops have been arrested.

The new approach reflects the views of senior commanders that the American military's large sweeps that sometimes rounded up several hundred ordinary Iraqis were alienating the public. At the same time, officials said, Iraqis are providing more and better information about suspected supporters of Mr. Hussein that has enabled the military to plan raids that are better focused on specific targets.

"The main difference is the ability to focus more precisely because of better intelligence," said Col. Guy Shields, a military spokesman in Baghdad. "Because of better intelligence, we may know the exact house, rather than just the block. That makes a big difference in the number of people you inconvenience."

The shift in tactics, which commanders began formulating last month, reflects the military's delicate balancing act between maintaining the support of an Iraqi public that is increasingly restless over the continuing disorder and slow pace of restoring electrical power and water, and combating Baathist Party operatives, foreign fighters, Islamic militants and criminals.

With American commanders acknowledging that the presence of 140,000 United States troops has attracted an influx of foreign fighters and terrorists from outside Iraq, developing accurate and timely intelligence has become increasingly important to the American-led occupation.

"Ultimately, the people who are going to be most effective against the pockets of extremism, Baathist remnants and other threats to internal security will be Iraqis, not Americans," Gen. John P. Abizaid, the commander of American forces in Iraq, said in an interview on Thursday, the day before a car bomb in Najaf killed more than 80 people. "The vast majority of our operations are enabled by Iraqis."

But Iraqis had complained that the big sweeps the military had conducted as recently as mid-July were rounding up not only Baathists and criminals, but also ordinary Iraqis. As a result, General Abizaid and his top field commander, Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, decided that the larger operations were becoming counterproductive. General Sanchez first raised the idea of changing tactics during an interview with The New York Times last month.

"We have to be as precise in our combat operations with ground troops going into villages as we were in our combat operations in the war with our precision-guided weapons," General Abizaid said. "We can't be indiscriminate. We can't just round up people and then sort them out. It makes no sense to conduct a military operation that creates more enemies than friends."

General Abizaid said developing better intelligence would be discussed by top military and civilian planners in Baghdad later this week in a major strategy session to review Iraq policies. American officials are also trying to accelerate the training of an Iraqi army, police force and civil defense corps, in part so those forces can establish ties to Iraqis who can provide additional tips.

"We'll discuss all levels of security building within Iraq," General Abizaid, said, adding that a goal of this week's meeting would be to rethink the allies' campaign plan. "Though it's not my mission to build intelligence forces, it is my mission to achieve intelligence breakthroughs."

He denied reports that the American military or civilian authorities were recruiting former agents of the Iraqi intelligence service. "None of us are interested in having the bad guys on our team," he said.

General Abizaid said American forces had to be careful that intelligence provided by Iraqis was not simply to settle old grievances. He acknowledged that in some cases, this had happened and American forces had made mistakes.

Commanders are incorporating the new approach toward pinpointing enemy forces in operations against suspected guerrillas across the country. Two raids last week north of Baghdad were the first large-scale missions to use the tactics, commanders said.

"What we are doing is surgical strikes on more remote areas where we have not had a very large or enduring military presence," Maj. Josslyn Aberle, a spokeswoman for the Fourth Infantry Division, told reporters in Tikrit last week.

In one raid near Baqubah, about 40 miles north of Baghdad, elements of the Fourth Division focused on a network headed by Lateef Hamed al-Kubaishata, a convicted murderer and gangster known as Lateef. He escaped, Army officers said, but 24 others were detained, including seven Iraqis wanted in connection with attacks against American forces.

His gang had claimed responsibility for a bomb that exploded outside police headquarters in Baqubah on Aug. 10, killing one American military policeman, Army officers said. Lateef is also accused of selling weapons, burning down the Baqubah courthouse to destroy criminal records, and killing a prostitute whom he accused of fraternizing with United States troops.

"Their primary focus is probably criminal activity, but they have attacked coalition forces through direct and indirect means," Col. David Hogg, commander of the Fourth Division's Second Brigade, told The Associated Press last week. "As long as he is in place, we will not be able to establish the conditions for the Iraqi police to establish law and order in the area."

Colonel Shields, the military spokesman, said troops were increasingly using "cordon and knock" operations, in which a home or building is surrounded by American troops who then seek permission to enter accompanied by an Iraqi representative, rather than just kicking down the door.

But the military will not hesitate to use major force when necessary to bring down their foes. "When we have to be hard," General Abizaid said, "we'll be hard."

nytimes.com



To: unclewest who wrote (6542)9/2/2003 2:50:39 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
Here is what Wolfie thinks

FROM BAGHDAD TO BIN LADEN
Support Our Troops
Iraq isn't part of the war on terror? Try telling the soldiers that.

BY PAUL WOLFOWITZ
Tuesday, September 2, 2003 12:01 a.m.

When terrorists exploded a bomb outside a shrine in Najaf last week, they killed scores of Muslims who had gathered for prayers--including one of Iraq's foremost Shiite leaders, who had been playing a key role in stabilizing post-Saddam Iraq. Similarly, when a bomb detonated in the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad recently, those killed and injured were innocent men and women--including Iraqis--who were engaged in the humanitarian mission of rebuilding Iraq.

But those victims weren't the only targets. Terrorists were aiming a blow at something they hate even more--the prospect of a country freed from their control and moving to become an Iraq of, by, and for the Iraqi people. Terrorists recognize that Iraq is on a course towards self-government that is irreversible and, once achieved, will be an example to all in the Muslim world who desire freedom, pointing a way out of the hopelessness that the extremists feed on. And so, they test our will, the will of the Iraqi people, and the will of the civilized world.

While we can't yet fix blame for this most recent act of terrorism, we do know this: Despite their differences, the criminal remnants of Saddam's sadistic regime share a common goal with foreign terrorists--to bring about the failure of Iraqi reconstruction and take the country back to the sort of tyrannical prison from which it has just been freed. The recent broadcast of a taped message by an alleged al Qaeda spokesman offered congratulations to "our brothers in Iraq for their valiant struggle against the occupation, which we support and urge them to continue."

Anyone who thinks that the battle in Iraq is a distraction from the war on terror should tell it to the Marines of the 1st Marine Division who comprised the eastern flank of the force that fought its way to Baghdad last April. When I met recently with their commander, Maj. General Jim Mattis in Hillah, he said that the two groups who fought most aggressively during the major combat operations were the Fedayeen Saddam--homegrown thugs with a cult-like attachment to Saddam--and foreign fighters, principally from other Arab countries. The exit card found in the passport of one of these foreigners even stated that the purpose of his "visit" to Iraq was to "volunteer for jihad."

We face that poisonous mixture of former regime loyalists and foreign fighters today.

Even before the bombing of the U.N. headquarters, if you'd asked Gen. Mattis and his Marines, there was no question in their minds that the battle they wage--the battle to secure the peace in Iraq--is now the central battle in the war on terrorism. It's the same with the commander of the Army's 1st Armored Division, Brig. Gen. Martin Dempsey, who recently described that second group as "international terrorists or extremists who see this as the Super Bowl." They're going to Iraq, he said, "to take part in something they think will advance their cause." He added, "They're wrong, of course." Among the hundreds of enemy that we have captured in the last months are more than 200 foreign terrorists who came to Iraq to kill Americans and Iraqis and to do everything they can to prevent a free and successful Iraq from emerging. They must be defeated--and they will be.

Our regional commander, Gen. John Abizaid, head of Central Command, echoed Gen. Dempsey, placing in larger perspective the battle in Iraq. He said, "The whole difficulty in the global war on terrorism is that this is a phenomenon without borders. And the heart of the problem is in this particular region, and the heart of the region happens to be Iraq. If we can't be successful here, we won't be successful in the global war on terrorism." Success in Iraq will not be easy. According to Gen. Abizaid, it will be long, hard and sometimes bloody; but "it is a chance, when you combine it with initiatives in the Arab/Israeli theater and initiatives elsewhere, to make life better, to bring peace to an area where people are very, very talented and resources are abundant, especially here in Iraq."

Foreign terrorists who go to Iraq to kill Americans understand this: If killing Americans leads to our defeat and the restoration of the old regime, they would score an enormous strategic victory for terrorism--and for the forces of oppression and intolerance, rage and despair, hatred and revenge. Iraqis understand this. Alongside us, they are working hard to fight the forces of anger and hopelessness and to seize this historic opportunity to move their country forward.

Just as in the Cold War, holding the line in Berlin and Korea was not just about those places alone. It was about the resolve of the free world. Once that resolve was made clear to the Soviets, communism eventually collapsed. The same thing will happen to terrorism--and to all those who have attempted to hijack Islam and threaten America and the rest of the free world, which now includes Iraq. They will see our resolve and the resolve of the free world. Then they, too, will take their place on the ash heap of history.

America's troops and our coalition partners are determined to win--and they will win, if we continue to give them the moral and material support they need to do the job. As the president said recently, our forces are on the offensive. And as Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. John Keane said in congressional testimony, "They bring the values of the American people to this conflict. They understand firmness, they understand determination. But they also understand compassion. Those values are on display every day as they switch from dealing with an enemy to taking care of a family."

I saw the troops in Iraq, and Gen. Keane is absolutely right. I can tell you that they, above all, understand the war they are fighting. They understand the stakes involved. And they will not be deterred from their mission by desperate acts of a dying regime or ideology.

Not long ago, a woman named Christy Ferer traveled to Iraq along with the USO. She'd lost her husband Neil Levin at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, and she wanted to say thank you to the troops in Baghdad. She wrote a wonderful piece about her trip, and in it, she wondered why our soldiers would want to see her, when they could see the Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders, movie stars and a model. When the soldiers heard that a trio of Sept. 11 family members were there, she found out why.

Young men and women from across America rushed to the trio, eager to touch them and talk to them. One soldier, a mother of two, told Christy she'd enlisted because of Sept. 11. Another soldier displayed the metal bracelet he wore, engraved with the name of a victim of 9/11. Others came forward with memorabilia from the World Trade Center they carried with them into Baghdad. And when it was Christy's turn to present Gen. Tommy Franks with a piece of steel recovered from the Trade Towers, she saw this great soldier's eyes well up with tears. Then, she watched as they streamed down his face on center stage before 4,000 troops.

To those who think the battle in Iraq is a distraction from the global war against terrorism . . . tell that to our troops.
Mr. Wolfowitz is deputy secretary of defense.

opinionjournal.com