SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (113689)9/2/2003 10:25:41 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
And with Clinton's military.

C'mon, John, the Afghanistan war was a walk in the park. The Taliban folded like a cheap shirt. Even a severely depleted American military would have had no problem against a horse-riding, Soviet-era equipped "force." Heck, the French could have done it given enough time.

Using the Afghanistan war as an example is a bit much.

By the time the war with Iraq came about, the Bush Administration's imprint on the military was much more noticeable.

You forget an important point: the military abhorred Clinton. His personal foibles, draft-dodging and, yes, spouse, were anathemas to military culture. Not so Bush. While I can't prove the point empirically, it is my opinion that a military force with Bush as CinC would have undoubtedly performed better than an identical one under under Clinton's command. A matter of spirit and leadership.



To: JohnM who wrote (113689)9/2/2003 10:49:32 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Perhaps. But the ballooning deficits are definitely worrisome. "

John,
You never commented on my war surtax. That was a flat tax on tax paid so it would be completely progressive and could be instituted without repealing the repeal of the marriage penalty, death tax et al. Structural pro business reforms remain and we get to pay for the war and cap the deficit at these levels which probably have reached the limits of where they can be without negatively impacting the economy. Win/Win. Mike