Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (451581)	9/2/2003 12:16:46 PM
From: cnyndwllr	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769668

Just answer the question and then you can baffle us all with your seemingly psychic ability to know what Kerry was thinking and who "scripted" his actions for him. In case you forgot, here's the question: --------------------------------------------------------- "Prolife, maybe you can explain your statement with respect to Kerry that: >>"I think he mentioned he was a Vietnam vet 6 or 8 times........what will be remembered more is how he came back and protested while there were still men fighting, while the war still could have been won..."<< I'm wondering what your strategy was for winning a war against a committed guerrilla force aided by neighboring nations? I've never heard anyone explain how we could have won in Vietnam although I've heard a lot people SAY it. Maybe you can tell us your strategy? I think that's important because maybe we could use that brilliant strategy in Afghanistan and Iraq. I hope it's not prorietary information. If you can't outline any strategy that had a reasonable chance of success, then SHUT UP about Kerry coming home and protesting a war that seemingly had no real benefits and was costing American lives numbering in the hundreds every WEEK. That's fair, isn't it?" -------------------------------------------------------- Or maybe you were just repeating some right wing drivel that you can't logically support? That's it, isn't it?