Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (174875)	9/3/2003 6:39:20 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579732

Also remember when we discussing Clinton, and you said something about how Clinton is no longer president and we should move on? Well Prescott Bush's actions where in this matter where in the 30s and 40s. Also he is dead. Personally I have no problem discussing history but if Prescott Bush is on the table why not Clinton? First of all, this is the first time I've brought up ole Prescott. Secondly, Clinton was brought up ad nauseum. Thirdly, this is part of Bush's family.....if he has a Nazi sympathizer as well as a bin Laden sympathizer [see Bush I and the Carlyle Group] in the family, then you know what they say, the acorn doesn't fall far from the tree and may warrant further investigation. It does seems terribly coincidental that the Bush family is or has been associated with some of the most despicable people in the history of the world. And I am certainly not running this issue into the ground as was done with the Monica/Clinton affair. ted