Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (73909)	9/9/2003 8:56:58 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 82486

It's easy to say there should be a bright line. And sometimes there are. No said with no conflicting actions is always no. Using drugs or physical force is always no. With at least drugs there can still be a conflicted ambiguous situation. If one person drugs the other without their knowledge to cause them to be unable to resist sex then it is rape, but if both people are taking drugs together and they have sex I don't see how that makes it rape even if they probably would not have had sex without the drugs. If the drugs did make it rape in that case then both partners could claim they where raped. Tim