SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (73996)9/5/2003 1:30:27 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"And do you think one should leave someone alone on SI if they ask to be left alone? "

I do.



To: E who wrote (73996)9/5/2003 2:10:27 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 82486
 
I guess you don't think no means no.



To: E who wrote (73996)9/5/2003 2:36:45 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
And remember, you posted to me first. Don't join my conversations if you want to be ignored.

Actually, I will modify my request. I'm sure we agree that a woman can say "no, I don't want to have sex with you" without having to cut off all relations with the person. Two people can be friends up to certain points but not beyond. A "No" in one context doesn't have to mean a "No" in all contexts.

So I am saying "NO" to discussions of past events concerning you, me, Poet, et. al. I am not saying no to all possible future relationships with you. We can still go on electronic dates, meet at a SI friend's house, etc. We just won't go all the way. I am asking you not to verbally assault me, and I deem your continued dredging up of long dead and buried issues to constitute assault. I say no to your assaulting me. But I don't say no to friendly relations. Just as a woman is entitled to say to a man, no, you can't rape me, but we can still go out to dinner together.

BTW, you say don't join your conversation, but I would note that I have been posting here steadily for quite a while, was an active participant in that discussion, when you jumped in. Which is fine. But don't go accusing me of joining your conversation when it was precisely the opposite.

Now, I hope we understand each other.

No to assault, verbal or otherwise.

Yes to friendly relations.



To: E who wrote (73996)9/5/2003 4:38:58 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Let's also not forget, E, that you asked me to stop referring to certain posts in our past, and I have scrupulously complied with your request, while still posting with you on other topics.

As I am sure you will comply with my request. Right? Right.