Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (74010)	9/5/2003 2:37:43 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

No, it is unresponsive to the discussion that has been going on. No one is saying that the guy should not be charged. A circumstance where some ambiguity remained was discussed. It was affirmed that in such a situation, penetration would constitute sexual assault at least. Nevertheless, the possibility that the situation raised questions of intent and degree of culpability was discussed, along with the difference between aggressiveness and true coercion. After all of that, you come back with a mindless slogan.......