SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (6889)9/6/2003 12:35:05 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793759
 
A big win for Truth, Justice, and the American Way, over the forces of evil in the Teacher's Unions. :>)

September 6, 2003
House Approves a Voucher Plan for Poor Washington Students
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS - [The New York Times]

WASHINGTON, Sept. 5 - The House narrowly approved private-school vouchers for poor Washington students today, recharging a debate that has implications beyond the capital.

Under the House plan, passed on a vote of 205 to 203, the federal government would for the first time put aside public money for students to get private schooling. A similar measure for Washington students is making headway in the Senate, where it has the support of not only the Republican majority but also some Democrats, and President Bush has championed the idea.

The House measure, which envisions a five-year pilot program and allows $10 million for financing the first year of it, would let at least 1,300 students switch to private schools; the number could grow if some students received less than the maximum of $7,500 a year. The vote came as an amendment to a bill outlining the capital city's budget, which the House is expected to approve next week.

The plan for Washington is significant nationally because any movement toward or away from school vouchers is watched closely, said Todd Ziebarth, an analyst for the Education Commission of the States, a nonprofit provider of education policy information.

"To see the federal government put in place a voucher program for the D.C. public schools," Mr. Ziebarth said, "would push the momentum toward the proponents: `Look, the federal government has done it for D.C. Shouldn't we do it for our urban schools as well?' "

Still, with states in their worst financial shape in decades, he said, this is not a time when many state leaders will be inclined to start earmarking money for private schools, although six states already offer some form of vouchers.

Supporters of the amendment passed today, who included only 4 Democrats along with 201 Republicans, said students should not be forced to stay in a Washington school system notorious for academic struggles. Under the program, priority would go to students at schools officially identified as needing improvement.

"Wealthy people in America have school choice, but poor people don't, and many of those families in poor neighborhoods cannot afford a private option," said Representative Dave Weldon, Republican of Florida. "And unfortunately, many of those types of situations are in the District of Columbia."

Representative John A. Boehner, Republican of Ohio, said the plan would give hope to students who attend "the worst schools in America."

Critics said that vouchers amounted to an abandonment of public schools and that the money would be better used to improve teachers and repair crumbling school buildings.

Eleanor Holmes Norton, the city's nonvoting delegate to Congress, said Washington residents did not want to be the subject of a national experiment.

"If you vote for vouchers," Ms. Norton said, "you will send a signal to every private school in the country, to every organization of private schools, that this is the time to bring pressure to get the same private-school deal that the District of Columbia got."

Representative Danny K. Davis, Democrat of Illinois, said: "It's D.C. today. It's Chicago tomorrow, St. Louis, New Orleans, Los Angeles next week, then it's all of America."

The message, Mr. Davis said, "goes far beyond Washington, D.C."

But an amendment by Ms. Norton to strike the $10 million choice provision died on a 203-to-203 vote.

nytimes.com



To: JohnM who wrote (6889)9/6/2003 6:41:51 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793759
 
Excellent rundown on the "inside politics in DC on school vouchers.

After images of a burning cross, Bull Connor and headlines about D.C.'s failing public schools, Mrs. Walden-Ford appears with a group of black children. There she asks Teddy Kennedy how he can turn his back on Bobby and Jack Kennedy's civil-rights legacy with a filibuster that would deny these kids a shot at a decent education.

REVIEW & OUTLOOK
Mary's Choice
Sen. Landrieu to D.C. schoolkids: Drop dead.
WSJ.com
Saturday, September 6, 2003 12:01 a.m.

If Senator Mary Landrieu is mortified about the way her recent flip-flop on school vouchers for Washington, D.C., is playing, we suspect it has something to do with a full-page ad that attracted national attention after it ran in her home state's leading newspaper, the Times-Picayune of New Orleans.

The ad, the top of which is reproduced below, stems from a hallway encounter the Senator had with nine-year-old Mosiyah Hall in July after Mrs. Landrieu had announced that she wouldn't be supporting vouchers for D.C. schoolchildren this time around. This led young Mosiyah to ask the natural question: Where did the Senator send her own kids?

The Louisiana Democrat answered "Georgetown Day"--one of the district's toniest private academies--and went on to offend the mostly black mothers on hand when she came over to explain that even with this D.C. voucher measure they still wouldn't be able to afford Georgetown Day.

Notwithstanding Mrs. Landrieu's switcheroo, on Thursday the Senate Appropriations Committee did finally approve the measure. Critical support came from California Democrat Dianne Feinstein, who says she was persuaded to cast her first pro-school choice vote by the support it enjoyed from the District of Columbia's African-American Mayor and school board president. The bill passed the House yesterday, setting up a bloody battle on the Senate floor, with Teddy Kennedy promising to filibuster at the schoolhouse door.

Congress has dealt with D.C. voucher bills before, but the fallout from the Landrieu switch points to a politically potent new element: the increasing public exposure of Congressmen and Senators who won't entrust their own children to the Capital's miserable public schools but will sabotage any effort to give kids like Mosiyah Hall the same chance.

<http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/9603mary.jpg> In fairness, Senator Landrieu is not the only guilty party here. Pennsylvania Republican Arlen Specter, whose own children also enjoyed a private education, has also retracted his previous support for D.C. vouchers. Senator Specter's cynical bet is that denying choice to inner-city black and Latino kids won't hurt him among the Republican suburbanites in his primary battle next year with conservative challenger Pat Toomey and will help keep Pennsylvania teachers unions off his back in the general election.

That kind of sell-out has been easier in the past, when vouchers were only a figment of Milton Friedman's splendid imagination. But this bill, coming after last year's Supreme Court victory, is pushing some uncomfortable comparisons to the fore. As a just-released Heritage Foundation survey of Congress reports, Members choose private schools for their own children at more than four times the national average. Yet those same Members all too often provide the margin of defeat when it comes to extending those same opportunities to others.

For Republicans, this issue is a great moral indicator. A GOP Congress sent up a D.C. voucher bill to the White House in the Clinton years. But at least some of those voting yes at the time did so secure in the knowledge that Bill Clinton would nix the whole thing with a veto. With President Bush now saying he's eager to sign such an experiment, the D.C. voucher bill comes as a test of the GOP's commitment to its avowed concern for inner-city residents who don't usually vote Republican.

Democrats have their own credibility issues, in particular the mounting price being paid by the children of their African-American constituents for the party's obeisance to teachers unions. Senator Feinstein, to her immense credit, has broken with Democratic orthodoxy to give these kids some hope. But it will be telling to see where, say, Senator Joe Lieberman comes down, caught as he is between his previous support of vouchers and his current run for the Democratic Presidential nomination.

And if Mary Landrieu and Co. think the Times-Picayune ad played hardball, they ought to take a look at a new TV spot that ran Thursday during "Good Morning America." The spot features Virginia Walden-Ford, an African-American mother who heads both D.C. Parents for School Choice and the Washington chapter of the Black Alliance for Educational Options.

After images of a burning cross, Bull Connor and headlines about D.C.'s failing public schools, Mrs. Walden-Ford appears with a group of black children. There she asks Teddy Kennedy how he can turn his back on Bobby and Jack Kennedy's civil-rights legacy with a filibuster that would deny these kids a shot at a decent education. This is playing rough, but then it is also in response to voucher opponents who claim dishonestly that supporters want to "destroy the public schools."

Democrats have all but owned black voters for decades, largely on the basis of their 1960s civil-rights legacy. But the premier civil-rights battle of our day isn't voting rights or where one can sit on a public bus. It is the scandal of inner-city public schools and the support for them by politicians and union leaders who wouldn't dare let their own kids near them.

Perhaps that message is finally breaking through, which would help explain why Mrs. Landrieu ended up voting "present" in committee. As the bill to liberate D.C. children heads for its Senate showdown, opponents need to start asking themselves if this is the side of history they really want to be on.
opinionjournal.com