To: WWS who wrote (25460 ) 9/7/2003 3:05:47 AM From: energyplay Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 206085 Chicken and Egg problem - Okay, say you run a small E&P company, and you drill in Texas, Colorado and sometimes a few other places.... You have some marginal in field properties in an older area of Colorado. The wells make economic sense if the LOCAL price of gas is over $3.10. Inital production should be about 1 to 1.5 mmcf/day. Right now the price is $3.50, and likely to go higher... But, you are less that 20 miles from the edge Jackalope National Forest. There are several natural gas areas near the Forest, where the well have a history of producing over 10 mmcf/day, sometimes 20 mmcf. There are only two nearby pipelines, and they have about 150 mmcf/day spare capacity. Now here's what can happen ... Sceanario #1 A Democrate gets elected president or GWB gets re-elected but loose even more of the Seante and house to the Democrates. Price of natural gas stays high, there is no drilling in Jackalope, but lots of talk. You are getting $4.10 mcf and life is good...your banker takes you to lunch . Sceanario #2 George W gets re-elected and both the Senate and Congress are now controlled by Republicans and pro-business Democrates. Jackalope National Forest is thrown open for drilling . In one year, there are 24 new wells, producing over 200 mmcf per day. A new pipeline is planned, but right now your price is $2.20 mmcdf. and your number of mcf is restricted. Oh, and there is also a $0.20 mcf compression fee.... ***** I think while there is a possiblity that very low cost / high prodcuion areas will be opened up in the lower 48, many of the high cost projects will stay on hold, at least until after the 2004 election... This is contraty to expected economic behaviour, which I think is what DOE?EIA models. I also don't think the futures strip prices of natural gas really relfect this risk. I thik the futures strip tend to center on the most probalble events. Comment invited, I'm sure I got a lot wrong...