Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lurqer who wrote (27118)	9/6/2003 7:03:10 PM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

While much of this post is not new to readers of this thread, it does establish a timeline, and "flesh out" some details. Message 19278838 JMO lurqer

To: lurqer who wrote (27118)	9/6/2003 11:40:24 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Yes, it goes at least as way back as web.singnet.com.sg But on the other hand, one can trace it back to the catch-22 of two-party systems, Gulliver's Travels, Orwell and dysfunctional medias. UK, who lifted the (inofficial) ban on the debate for almost two years, just to quickly re-introduce it officially, went through some of the aspects back in 1996-7 However, as so many senior leaders sometimes say "it has served USA well" (usually refering to how the civil rights were implemented) That is, back to LBJ and Nixon, but maybe not (really) Jim Crow??