Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (44546)	9/8/2003 3:23:08 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF	Respond to of 50167

Expanding relations with India —Haaretz, Sept 7 Prime Minister Ariel Sharon departs tomorrow on an official visit to India. The trip will symbolize anew stage in the strengthening of relations between the two states. Eleven years have passed since the establishment of full diplomatic relations between New Delhi and Jerusalem; these relations were forged in the aftermath of the Madrid conference, and Israel’s entry in the peace process with its Arab neighbors. Since then, relations have developed in a strikingly impressive fashion, especially in terms of security and economic ties. Sharon will be Israel’s first Prime Minister to travel to India, and his visit is stirring considerable public interest there. New Delhi’s current right-wing government, headed by Atal Bihari Vajpayee, shares with Israel major strategic interests. Indeed, lines of similarity between the two states are hard to ignore. Since its establishment, India has battled with its Muslim neighbor and foe, Pakistan. Citizens in India suffer from attacks perpetrated by extremist Islamic groups. And a large Muslim minority dwells in their country. India also developed nuclear arms beyond the confines of international agreements. Despite its tense security situation, India has managed to maintain a stable democracy, and also to notch achievements in terms of the ethnic integration of Hindus, Muslims and Christians in the state. Under these circumstances, it was only natural for India to seek close ties with Israel, a state which is also a “democracy at war,” and which has acquired an international reputation in weapons development and for its war on terror. In fact, India claimed a front seat among clients of Israel Military Industries, whose heads will accompany Sharon on his visit this week. Israel became India’s second most important supplier of arms; it provided sophisticated weapons systems to India, and established a joint, anti-terror, forum with the country. Major transactions involving the sale of the Phalcon airborne reconnaissance system, and missiles to defend ships, are currently on the agenda. After having led for years the world’s “neutral” camp that opposed American influence, India has over the past two years strengthened ties with the United States. This improved relationship with Washington has encouraged India’s leadership to think in terms of a triangular alliance in which India and Israel would act as cushions providing stability in the tumultuous South Asia/Middle East regions, areas that face threats posed by terror, and by the dictatorial regimes of Arab, Muslim states. Recently, after a one-year delay, the U.S. agreed to the sale of the Phalcon system to India. This whole strategic line of thinking forms an especially inviting background to the visit paid by Sharon, whose world view is formulated on assumptions compatible with ones found in New Delhi. No doubt, Sharon will be involved in a constructive exchange of opinions with Vajpayee and his colleagues about security problems shared by the two states. Yet the security ties do not need to serve as the sole foundation of relations with India. It is important to capitalize on momentum generated by the prime minister’s trip, and to use it to expand ties in civil spheres of economic investment and cultural exchange. Israel has an interest in taking part in large economic projects in India, and it should open its doors to companies and investors from India. In the diplomatic arena, the time has come for India to translate its openness toward Israel into changes in its voting patterns at the United Nations: up to now, India has automatically cast its ballots with the pro-Arab majority.

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (44546)	9/8/2003 3:28:54 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50167

US concerned about Afghan border security Rumsfeld for expanding security force Karzai seeks stricter Pakistani approach toward Taliban KABUL: Concerns persist about security at Afghanistan’s borders and terrorists’ infiltration of the country, US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said on Sunday. “It is something that requires continuing attention,” Mr Rumsfeld said at a news conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai in the capital. “It’s happening all across the globe. It proves the point that the global war on terror is not a problem in one country or for one country.” President Karzai said he hoped for results from Pakistan’s promise to step up efforts against Taliban militants crossing into Afghanistan. Mr Karzai said General Pervez Musharraf had promised that Pakistan would do all it could to stop “terrorist” activities along the border. “We are hoping that this cooperation would increase further between Afghanistan and Pakistan and also with the United States,” he said. “We believe that a joint fight against terrorism between Afghanistan and Pakistan and the US and the rest of the region is entirely ... in the interests of all the countries and international peace. We are hopeful that the stricter approach by Pakistan against the Taliban incursions into Afghanistan, against terrorism would produce the desired results,” he said. “We are definitely concerned about the increased activity of the Taliban on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border,” Mr Karzai said. Mr Karzai said in an interview with Canadian television on Saturday that Afghanistan could not hope to conquer terrorism without the “sincere” support of Pakistan. “This menace of terrorism...can’t go away unless the countries in this region, especially Pakistan and Afghanistan, cooperate with each other in a sincere, honest manner,” he said. Mr Rumsfeld also said at Sunday’s press conference he was hopeful NATO might expand peacekeeping operations outside the Afghan capital, but that security was primarily the responsibility of Afghans. The Afghan government, the UN and aid agencies have long appealed for peacekeepers to be deployed outside Kabul, and hopes this might happen have risen since NATO took command of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in August. “I certainly agree that an expansion of ISAF would be a good thing,” Mr Rumsfeld said in response to a question. “For whatever reason, there have not been countries lining up to expand ISAF, but it strikes me that... there is at least the possibility of somewhat of an expansion. But in the last analysis, the security in Afghanistan is the responsibility of the Afghan people.” He made no mention of Washington’s plans to increase aid to Afghanistan, which President George Bush is expected to announce soon. The Bush administration said in July it was preparing a $1 billion aid package for schools, roads and other projects. Scores of residents demonstrated in Kabul on Sunday against the presence of US-led forces in Afghanistan and some, unhappy with Mr Karzai’s failure to bring security to many parts of the country, called for the return of the Taliban. Hours before Mr Rumsfeld arrived, the Afghan government said it had foiled a Taliban attack on the Zeelok district headquarters in Paktika province near the Pakistani border. US military spokesman said between 10 and 26 “enemy fighters” were believed killed in clashes overnight in the Dai Chopan district of Zabul. —AFP/AP/Reuters