Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : QQQ & DIA - chat & chart -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chris McConnel who wrote (689)	9/8/2003 12:23:48 PM
From: Jon Khymn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 795

Yea, I feel your pain, too, Chris. Now Nas 1880. We should have pull back very soon, that might be time to cover some. As of today, I'm 100% in. From now on, will cover bit at a time whenever I see meaningful pull back. We are at Mid term top, Nas may test 2000 again, but not without at least 100 point pull back... that's my reading right now. I see you have Ihub site, how do you like Ihub?

To: Chris McConnel who wrote (689)	9/8/2003 9:01:00 PM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 795

I went short the qubes about 2pm today, going by the 5 day chart and I failed to look at the daily Big Foot.. before I did my thing..had I looked I would have waited --- finance.yahoo.com It was clear by 11:15 the qubes were headed above the nasdaq.. but I didn't look . :-) --- I'm not to bad off because I bought some cheap calls to reduce risk before I went short.. If she's strong again tomorrow I'll close the short and let the calls run, but I still feel stupid, for shooting before I looked. Jim