To: KonKilo who wrote (7156 ) 9/8/2003 2:27:08 PM From: gamesmistress Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793766 This from a public, 70% of whom believe Saddam was behind 9-11. Here is a recent breakdown of that 70%. If you believe "very" or "somewhat" to question #2, it's not such a great leap to #1. Depends on how you define "personally". You can be convicted of a murder even if you weren't the one pulling the trigger. Washington Post Poll: Saddam Hussein and the Sept. 11 Attacks Saturday, September 6, 2003 The latest Washington Post poll is based on telephone interviews with 1,003 randomly selected adults nationwide, and was conducted Aug. 7-11, 2003. The margin of sampling error for overall results is plus or minus 3 percentage points. Sampling error is only one of many potential sources of error in this or any other public opinion poll. Interviewing was conducted by TNS Intersearch of Horsham, Pa. *= less than 0.5 percent How likely is it that Saddam Hussein (INSERT ITEM) ? Would you say that it is very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely, or not at all likely? --------Likely------- -------Not Likely------ No NET Very Somewhat NET Not very At all opin. a. was personally involved in the September 11 terrorist attacks 69 32 37 28 15 12 3 b. has provided assistance to Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network 82 51 31 14 8 6 4 c. was trying to develop weapons of mass destruction 84 62 22 14 9 5 3 d. had already developed weapons of mass destruction 78 51 27 19 12 7 3 a. was personally involved in the September 11 terrorist attacks --------Likely------- -------Not Likely------ No NET Very Somewhat NET Not very At all opin. 8/11/03 69 32 37 28 15 12 3 2/6/03* 72 34 38 25 16 9 3 10/24/02 71 34 37 25 16 9 4 9/13/01# 78 34 44 12 9 3 9 * 2/6/03 and previous - Time/CNN. "…personally involved in the terrorist attacks (on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon) on September 11th (2001) -- very likely, somewhat likely…" # "How likely is it that Saddam Hussein is personally involved in Tuesday's terrorist attacks..." b,c,d. No trend. washingtonpost.com