SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: NickSE who wrote (7157)9/8/2003 9:40:14 AM
From: NickSE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793800
 
I can't believe the mullahs are still gunning for nukes after what did to Iraq. They must think we're incapable of launching an offensive given the strain on our armed forces. Imho, this is the reason why we're going to the UN for foreign troops.

Bush on warpath over UN's shock report on Iran A-bomb - 9 Sept 2003
by Con Coughlin
telegraph.co.uk

America will tomorrow demand that the United Nations takes urgent action to prevent Iran acquiring the atom bomb as fears mount that Teheran is on course to develop a nuclear weapons capability within two years.

United States officials will make the demand at a special meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna that has been arranged to consider a 10-page report by Mohammed al-Baradei, the agency's director-general, into the state of Iran's nuclear programme.

Washington has already expressed deep concern about the discovery of traces of weapons grade uranium found in soil samples taken from one of Iran's top secret nuclear facilities last July.

In his report, a copy of which has been obtained by The Telegraph, Mr al-Baradei lists serious concerns raised by UN weapons inspectors about the scope of Iran's nuclear programme, which Teheran continues to insist is aimed at developing a nuclear power industry.

Inspectors are particularly concerned about activity at a nuclear complex at Natanz, in central Iran, which has sophisticated equipment for enriching uranium to weapons grade standard.

Even though the complex was built five years ago, the Iranian authorities only confirmed its existence to the IAEA earlier this year after its location was revealed by Iranian exiles.

The report also details the inspectors' concerns about the development of a heavy water facility at Arak, which they believe could help Iran to manufacture weapons grade uranium.

Mr al-Baradei writes in the report's conclusion that "there remain a number of important outstanding issues, particularly with regard to Iran's enrichment programme, that require urgent resolution".

US officials, however, are concerned that Mr al-Baradei, who this year argued in favour of UN inspectors being given more time to locate Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, will try to play down the significance of the recent discoveries made in Iran.

One American closely involved in monitoring Iran's nuclear programme said: "The big difference between Iraq and Iran is that the Iranians now have the ability to develop an atom bomb within two years. The time has come to force the Iranians to come clean about their real intentions."

Although Mr al-Baradei admits that the Iranians have deployed a variety of delaying tactics to prevent UN inspectors gaining access to secret nuclear facilities, he believes that they should be given more time to comply with their obligations under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty.

American officials fear that many Europeans on the IAEA's 35-member board of governors, some of whose countries have lucrative trade ties with Teheran, will back Mr al-Baradei's position.



To: NickSE who wrote (7157)9/8/2003 9:58:56 AM
From: John Carragher  Respond to of 793800
 
Looks like France, Germany and Russia convinced him they would tie up the U.S. in United Nations. Both could then continue to reap rewards from the food program and he from keeping all the money from the people... Long term they hoped U.S. would go away and then France , Russia , Germany could do more business with Iraq.

Well he is gone.. let's hope we all can get back to helping this country gain independence.



To: NickSE who wrote (7157)9/8/2003 3:23:54 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793800
 
Saddam Thinking?

I will never forget my shock upon reading the after action reports from our SF guys in Afghanistan who joined the Northern Alliance. The NA leaders held them back from the front at first because they believed the US would cut and run if any of them became casualties.

We suffered a lot of misery on 911 because of this type of "World View" of us.