SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (455194)9/9/2003 9:27:36 AM
From: Vitas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
If the interests and contributions of the attacking members of the coalition were 100% identical, it would be "one sided.". They are not.

Each country has its own interests.

Your statement that "Iraq did nothing" to invite the attack -- it is a one-sided attack is not true.

It violated U.N Resolution 1441.

Either way you lose.



To: GST who wrote (455194)9/10/2003 6:11:12 AM
From: Vitas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"Multilateralism, similarly, is often directed at expanding the latitude of unilateralism. This is particularly true for the United States. Working with other states softens the jagged edges of American hegemony, breeding less resentment than coercion and bullying."

fletcher.tufts.edu

Get it? More than one state = not unilateral.

Hope this helps, although I have a feeling it won't. -lol-