Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (114207)	9/9/2003 11:50:24 AM
From: JohnM	Respond to of 281500

Oh, I don't think a large position hold that view. I simply stated it as my view, Michael. I don't get to my views by checking around to see how many respondents in national polls hold them. I'm not a politician so don't have to worry about it. And it's hardly "vile," it's rather a judgment. It's not based on "anger" but happens to be based on his many, many failures. And his political positions. As for not continuing the Marshall discussion, if you think that conversation was going anywhere, you certainly misread it. I repeat. You need to widen your views as to what constitutes serious political analysis. Marshall is serious, well informed, and mildly provocative. You disagree with his positions. Fine. Takes that kind of thing to make political conversations. But you've advanced zero evidence for your views. So, for anyone reading these posts, trying to decide whether Marshall is right or Michael is right, they can go back and read Marshall's long sequence of posts to see the full complement of his views, argued, almost endlessly, documented, well beyond any criteria anyone could advance. And then there's Michael. One post.