Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (455755)	9/9/2003 9:59:46 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

so...you would lie to a grand jury? Why am I not surprised? I will not be surprised to see your kids in bigtime trouble or jail. and they will say, "But my daddy says....."

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (455755)	9/9/2003 10:06:56 PM
From: Peter O'Brien	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

Lying UNDER OATH TO A COURT is a crime. Clinton has no one but himself to blame. He could of settled with Paula Jones (ultimately, that is what happened anyway). But he tried to fight it in court and committed perjury in the process. And, it is the DEMOCRATS that passed the law in 1994 (signed by Clinton himself!) that empowered the attorneys for Paula Jones to ask Clinton embarrassing questions under oath about his sexual behavior. This law was the "Violence Against Women Act of 1994". This law specifically empowered a plaintiff in a sexual harassment suit to pry into the sexual behavior of the defendant, while at the same time it shielded the plaintiff from having to answer such questions.