SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (74279)9/10/2003 2:00:17 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I think that government should be limited by the law, and by the actual law, not something that might bear some distant relation to something in or even just hinted at by the law.

If you think about how your approach would play out in real life, I think you'd see that it's not practicable. Those who write the law aren't gods. They can't think of everything, they aren't always precise in their language, and they aren't monolithic in their intent. I think we would have a serious mess if courts did not make judgments where laws are unclear.

If you have a city ordinance that you can't sell vegetables inside city limits without a license and somebody sells tomatoes, which are a fruit, technically, what do you do? If everything like that got sent back to the legislature, we'd be tied up in knots. And, in the case of the Constitution, you can't send it back for a redo and it's next to impossible to amend. So you interpret. Life would come to a screeching halt otherwise.