SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (456299)9/10/2003 3:45:07 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
yes if you don't think social security is actually a tax and is unlikely to survive past the baby boom. If you think that, as I do, then flat taxes without SS will likely LOWER taxes for the poor from today's rates.

A lot of tax issues can be solved if we just dump SS and only keep it alive for the elderly poor, and kill the bushonomic aggressive defense spending.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News