SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David W. Taylor who wrote (688)9/10/2003 5:36:33 PM
From: Silver Super Bull  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
David,

RE: "Elliott Wave has only been wrong once in a major way. Prechter was too early calling the top in 1995-6, when it took until March 2000. Before that and since then they have been so correct that it is like witchcraft."

Does Prechter actually have a summary of his major calls over the years? I would be interested in seeing them.

I was just on the web site and saw the new "Beautiful Pictures" book. Have you pre-ordered? <g> The premise sounds interesting...

DB



To: David W. Taylor who wrote (688)9/15/2003 10:25:05 AM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
I spell as I choose, I employ American slang
I assure you of my near total command of the English language

re: EW
you are biased pro
I am biased con

after Gold does its thing, Prechter will be silenced
and I will have a lasting smile
he is a total distraction
you dont comment on my criticism that he regards gold purely as a commodity, missing the monetary currency reserve safehaven role
that is his greatest blind spot

Prechter avoids the proven tenet which has demonstrated for a full century that the sentinel signal for a gold longterm bull market is negative shorterm real interest rates
how could any educated scholar miss this?
Prechter not only did, but he continues to do so?

I am through on this subject, not worth my time
and your views have added absolutely nothing to my edification on the subject

no need for me to shout you down
your comments on this topic are incredibly effective in cutting your own legs out from under you

"like witchcraft" !!!! jeez loueez (are you 12 yrs old?)
by the way, whenever I misspell an English word, it is intentional
/ jim



To: David W. Taylor who wrote (688)9/15/2003 1:01:31 PM
From: Threshold  Respond to of 110194
 
<<Your name calling, bad spelling and grammar (not native English speaker?) and surly attitude completely detract from your message and make it hard to see what value you are offering us.>>

Frankly, I'd rather have a raving genius pound the truth into my head, while calling me an idiot, than listen to the cultured and refined lies that politically correct financial "experts" lizard out of their lips.

The message is important. The delivery is for socialites.