Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (4666)	9/10/2003 5:19:23 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 10965

Bush may not have anything to run on in 2004. Nothing. He was hoping Iraq victory and tax cut recovery would be the issues. But neither have worked out at all. He was also hoping maybe start another war. But we have no troops or money left.

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (4666)	9/10/2003 5:46:21 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire	Respond to of 10965

The debate was very good, including the "Impeach Cheney" comments from the audience. I was astounded that Sharpton was as eloquent a speaker as he came off. Lieberman looked disgusted, {the guy can't help it but he reminds me of the old "ALF" series about the alien that lands on earth.} I thought the answers to a lot of questions that Gephart and Graham gave were off the mark. From a win / lose standpoint Dean was great, Kucinich made sense when he answered the questions, and Edwards wasn't as bad as I thought a trial would turn out to be. Definitley read the transcript. See who answered questions and who avoided.