Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (74396)	9/11/2003 1:44:52 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

If I have no way of knowing that they're homosexual, and they don't indicate that to me by actions or language then obviously there's no issue. I have nothing to be concerned about. The problem arises if they overtly in some way make clear that they are homosexual but haven't yet made a signal that they want something other than a simple massage. But the same would be true for opposite gender people, so the same rule should apply. Either I am allowed to refuse service to people whose gender or sexual orientation are such as to view men as potential sex partners, whether these individuals do so or not, or I have to serve anyone, including women, and wait for them to make some kind of signal that they are interested in more than a simple massage before being allowed to tell them sorry, please leave now.