SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (457201)9/11/2003 3:51:02 PM
From: cnyndwllr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Jewell, I agree. I don't think you can choose to fight "one war at a time." In view of your perspective that:

>>"[The followers of Bin Ladin] have expanded to other nations and ethnicities. They are represented by African youth carrying his posters in the streets and his former enemies withing the subpopulations of Muslims. They are determined to fight against us and have committed their children's children's children to the cause, without ever having met one another or even spoken a common language,"<<

what is a possible solution. It's clear that a war in Iraq that takes a huge toll on our budget, our intelligence capabilities, our military leadership, our intellectual capacity and our military and intelligence personnel, is not helping us in this battle. Do you think it's time for the Bush people to take a long step back and get a new perspective?



To: one_less who wrote (457201)9/11/2003 3:54:27 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
This is unlike anything our history books on war have ever dealt with

No this was examined 40 years ago in a brilliant essay.
<font color=purple>EROSION OF THE MYTH OF THE MONOPOLY OF COERCIVE FORCE
"In the past, those who no longer subscribed to the values of the dominant culture were held in check by the myth that the state possessed a monopoly on coercive force. This myth has undergone continual erosion since the end of World War II owing to the success of the strategy of guerrilla warfare, as first revealed to the French in Indochina, and later conclusively demonstrated in Algeria. Suffering as we do from what Senator Fulbright has called 'the arrogance of power,' we have been extremely slow to learn the lesson in Vietnam, although we now realize that war is political and cannot be won by military means. </font>

dieoff.com

The neocons continue to attempt the old strategy of world conquest by large armies. They are failing because the age of the conquering army is past.
TP



To: one_less who wrote (457201)9/11/2003 4:16:04 PM
From: gerard mangiardi  Respond to of 769667
 
You sound as crazy as they are. Remember wars against lower case letter words are never won. Remember the war on drugs or the war on poverty? Terrorism will always be around but al queda and the Taliban don't have to be. One location at a time is a good strategy. Too bad the chicken hawks didn't want to follow it. Once one country is cleaned out go to the next. We never finished the first.