Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Roebear who wrote (32492)	9/11/2003 4:36:13 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Respond to of 36161

baloney

To: Roebear who wrote (32492)	9/11/2003 4:37:05 PM
From: jrhana	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36161

The thread my die but so what Isopatch never made me a cent and I can name several others who have None of whom ever have displayed the abusive and thoroughly sick personality of your great Isopatch A man's worth has nothing to do with the size of his bank account Incidently I have nothing but the utmost respect for you

To: Roebear who wrote (32492)	9/11/2003 4:59:29 PM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

Its difficult to debate with a person so egocentric.....if one were to debate him his first option was to put people on ignore, the second option was to publically disgrace, the third option was to call them an ankle biter. Look at his new thread he started today.......many of us are already on ignore before a chance is given. I hope he enjoys his mountain of ytd profits, his new Beemer, and the new art and etchings. I feel I know more about Iso's personal life than I really care too. On the other hand, you are one poster I read because you kept it down the centre and you are one very knowledgeable person. Good luck in your endeavours. Jane

To: Roebear who wrote (32492)	9/11/2003 5:43:51 PM
From: Frank Pembleton	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 36161

Uhhh, I quit participating on SI because of Isopatch. You and I have had this conversation privately on a couple of occasions. The fact is I have absolutely no time to babysit someone who's a paranoid schizo. ...and to think people were actually taking his investment advice? The questions I have is why did I tolerate it for so long? Why do you protect him? Was it to preserve a chunk of SI history? Why did Larry C. start a new Strictly Drilling (without the ":")? Did he intend on guiding history into the future? Were the good old days that good? I guess my memory of it all is getting kind of sketchy because the lord knows I would of canned his ass after the first incident. I tolerate this insanity because of you guys, I guess it was Slider's last joke on us poor chihuahuas before he finally said his last "~outta here..." Regards, Michael..................................................... Btw, I loved his grand entrance this morning ... he walked right into the CFZ thread (or should I say the mouth of the dragon) he started bragging about those poor bagholders-- it had Gander spinning circles. Ha...ha...ha... IMO, all he was doing was telling us that he just doesn't give a flat f*ck what we think of him. The man has no shame...

To: Roebear who wrote (32492)	9/11/2003 6:01:28 PM
From: Yogizuna	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

Well said Roebear.

To: Roebear who wrote (32492)	9/11/2003 7:39:25 PM
From: nspolar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36161

Roe not being an original I can say I was a longtime lurker, on SD and then SDII. Who did I look for, the three amigoes ... iso, Roebear, and Slider. Notice the names are in alphabetical order. I lurked for so long I finally decided to participate. The reason was quite simple, the three amigoes in my opinion helped me improve my skills, not just a little but a lot. I have to give credit where credit is due. As for others that have assisted me in my learning, some names do come to mind .... Sharp, Shack, ATA, Zeev, Larry Dudash, aj, Shack, bcrafty, Shack, skinowski, The Freep, Shack ...., missing in action moonbeam, mishedlo especially via his Brian posts, John Maderez, AA, a few others I probably missed, and Shack again. The names are in no particular order, and there are lots of Shacks in there. More on that later. I've never made it a habit of getting into scraps, rather try to make it a habit to just leave, when I see something undesirable developing. I can fight and very well, but my conclusion is that first and foremost it always takes more than one, and second .. if I am one of the participants I am hurting myself, as much as the other guy. A board scrap makes waves, and waves are composed of energy, and energy makes currents, and well currents affect stock prices ... that is as long as the waves are confined to the charts. When the waves are taking up board space the energy is going elsewhere, and I believe in the first law of thermodynamics (only so much energy available). Why the so many Shacks and if so why am I going to post on iso's board, as well as others, and not for example just on Shack's. Simple, Shack has helped me with skills I need to participate in an arena in which I am comfortable, with folks I have gotten along with quite well, and with folks I intend to continue getting along with. Shack has done a good enough job that I need him less than I used to. This does mean I will not post elsewhere or not get along with others. Far from it. So to the future and cudoes to all that have assisted me, and I hope I have gained enough in knowledge and skills to the point that I can help a few others. Passing knowledge along does give one a certain feeling of satisfaction. A good thing to always ask is why am 'I' here. For me the primary purpose is to make money. Sure I enjoy the chitchat, but I enjoy the learning more, and maybe the making money part the most. So I follow the money, first and foremost as best I know how. Finally I'm moving on, and think it best for all to do the same.