Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (74501)	9/11/2003 5:59:43 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I understand. I agree with you, and said so before, that Jewel's masseur's criteria are wrong-headed. If his concern is that he not touch those who might get aroused, excluding women is over-broad and excluding men is also over-broad plus way, way too loaded. We agree, then, that spooky is a suitable criterion. Cool. Now, should there be a law that he can't discriminate against either women or gays or both? And, if so, how much of the state's energy should go into enforcing it?