SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (457436)9/11/2003 8:24:12 PM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 769667
 
no embarrassment. No more so then for clinto and Kerry who both agreed that Saddam had WMD. Get off your lying, girl.



To: American Spirit who wrote (457436)9/11/2003 8:45:20 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Re: "Bottomline, no WMD's is a huge embarrassment for Bush and the CIA which damages their credibility on everything else."

Oh, it's the worst, taking the whole economy down, LOL. You are a peach.

Re: "If it turns out they had no fresh intel since 1998 about WMD's"

That won't happen.

Re: "yet they ignored the Blix findings (or lack thereof) and invaded on an assumption?"

We never had to assume where Saddam is concerned. He hated us, vowed to get us, slaughtered his countrymen mercilessly, and harbored terrorists, IMHO. No need for WMD's to be found for our action to be deemed the correct move for our defense.

Re: "That is just incompetent"

No assumptions were required to know he needed to go, therefore no incompetence is implied by having done so.

Dan B



To: American Spirit who wrote (457436)9/11/2003 11:18:34 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
That is just incompetent.

No, it's impeachable.

The State of the Union address is the only constitutional requirement on the President to tell the truth, and Bush lied.

TP