Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (114595)	9/12/2003 3:12:34 PM
From: GST	Respond to of 281500

There is another scenario: We play verbal hardball and North Korea preempts us.

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (114595)	9/12/2003 6:13:11 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

re N. Korea, my guesses: 1. I doubt they now have nuclear weapons. I think they will test one, in secret, as soon as they have one. 2. They feel threatened, in need of a clear deterrent, so they won't hold off on testing, as India and Pakistan did. They'll test as soon as they can. 3. It'll be a secret test, as a failed pre-announced test would be a big "loss of face", and an invitation for the U.S. to invade quickly (in the window of opportunity before a successful test). 4. N. Korea will not engage in any serious negotiations, until after a successful test. This improves their bargaining position. They may also be waiting until a post-Bush Administration. 5. I, too, think they will only use a weapon in self-defense. The risk, here, is that the regime is so brittle, and so illegitimate, that any internal instability risks the use of nuclear weapons. "Self-defense" means defense of the regime, not just defense of the nation from external threats. By threatening them, we harden their siege mentality, and make a catastrophic miscalculation more likely. 6. Nations with nuclear weapons but no method for peaceful transfer of power, are a ticking time bomb.