SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (74589)9/12/2003 4:21:56 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Ok, well that is the way I have framed the question, which puts the finger pointing on the other guy. Most people are much more willing to lay blame over there. Maybe that is why it is more commonly reported via that approach. I believe that you are the careful type of person who would avoid the temptation to touch someone (handshake or otherwise) in a situation that could be problematic...and are exceptional in that regard rather than typical.

"And I've certainly never been turned on by a doctor or a priest. Or a movie star.

You realize that the reverse is the stereotype in our culture...right?



To: Lane3 who wrote (74589)9/12/2003 4:22:22 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 82486
 
Amen
although I do think people who do not rationally examine their lives are more prone to "sparking" at inappropriate times, then people who are more rational. I think some people spark at poor times, because they mix up things.

I think a lot of people are just bored, and use sexual excitement as a "cure" for general boredom- for example. And the people who do this, seem, for the most part, to be clueless they are doing it.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News