SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (74643)9/12/2003 8:02:39 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"How anyone you pay, people who often touch you as they put change in your hand? We wouldn't want any sparks setting fire to those greenbacks. <g>"

Even the business handshake is beginning to seem less and less necessary in many settings. However, there may be incidental touching in some business exchanges. I figure if someone made a habit of 'copping a feel' in the process, they could be called on the carpet for it. Not so easily discernable in the masseus industry.



To: Lane3 who wrote (74643)9/12/2003 8:02:41 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Hey if they want to consider themselves medical service providers fine they can personaly give up their excemption... <g>

There is a precedent for male and female salons, spas, gyms, etc. They were all that way until the fairly recent movement to unisex. But not all business went unisex and there was no requirement that they do so, so I think your masseur would be on firm ground there.

So its about precedents rather then abstract principle right?

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News