Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (458487)	9/13/2003 9:41:40 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 769670

Bush has been in bed with power polluters since his career began. Give Bush cash you get to pollute more. That's the deal. That's one thing Bushies mean by "deregulation". Corporate contributors get to do whatever the hell they want and the public be damned. If Bush gets re-elected, watch them gouge the hell out of the east coast like they did the west. And watch pollution levels continue to increase.

To: tejek who wrote (458487)	9/14/2003 2:35:38 PM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Why not start here to clean up the air. Asian Brown Cloud Contradicts, Confounds Global Warming Theories Author: James M. Taylor Published: The Heartland Institute 07/01/2003 Indian scientist Veerabhadran Ramanathan won global acclaim in 1999 when he discovered one of the largest, most deadly bodies of pollution ever observed. What Ramanathan did not realize at the time was that his service to science and humanity would make him one of the most controversial figures on the planet. A large cloud of soot, produced mainly by impoverished Asians burning dung for energy, is blanketing the region, and indeed the globe. Ramanathan’s discovery of the “Asian Brown Cloud,” as it came to be known, offered scientists an opportunity to study and perhaps eliminate one of Earth’s most deadly masses of pollution. However, study of the cloud indicated it was doing more than filling human respiratory systems with high levels of gritty soot, mercury, and other pollutants ... it was perhaps the single greatest cause of global warming on the planet. The cloud’s polluting effects, in the conventional sense of the word, are beyond dispute. In August 2002 the United Nations warned the cloud may cause “several hundreds of thousands of premature deaths” from disease and drought. Hans Friedli, a scientist at the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research, described flying into the cloud as “the highest concentration [of pollutants] that I have seen from an aircraft except when you fly into wildfires.” Link to Warming But scientists during the past year have linked the cloud to another, unexpected environmental issue: global warming. “Asian pollution, because it contains the residue from hundreds of millions of dung-fueled cooking fires and inefficient coal furnaces, carries an unusually large burden of soot,” reports the Wall Street Journal’s John Fialka. That soot, because it is darker than the bright emissions of Western industry, traps heat and sunlight much more effectively than Western emissions, which reflect heat and sunlight back into space. Dr. Surabit Menon, an atmospheric scientist at Columbia University, ran a computer program using Chinese weather reports to measure the warming effects of the brown cloud. He found the brown cloud contributes more to global warming than Western industrial emissions. U.S. assistant secretary of commerce James Mahoney agreed with Menon’s findings. According to Mahoney, the Asian brown cloud may cause as much planetary warming as all other global sources combined. “It is ironic that much of the pollution could be avoided by the use of cleaner fossil fuels, like gas, oil, and even coal, all of which release CO2,” said S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia. Politics Take Over As news broke of the connection between the Asian Brown Cloud and global warming, Ramanathan received warnings about what it could mean to his ongoing study of the cloud. “My colleagues told me when I got into this that global warming is not really pure science--politics is mixed in with it,” Ramanathan reported. Ramanathan’s colleagues were right. Indian officials, worried their country would be stigmatized for the cloud and forced to switch to more expensive fuel sources, called the global warming findings “a scientific fraud.” Rather than press for more funding to study the effects of the brown cloud, Asian officials successfully lobbied the United Nations to slash funding for brown cloud research. According to Fialka, “The dispute could slow scientific studies about how the Earth’s climate is changed by pollution. Such inquiries increasingly depend on international cooperation because the causes and effects of climate change transcend national boundaries.” Future Implications Discovery of the strong connection between the brown cloud and global warming vindicates the U.S. government’s insistence that more scientific study is necessary before extreme policy prescriptions, such as those contained in the Kyoto Protocol, are adopted. Kyoto would impose severe cuts on alleged greenhouse gas sources in Western industrial nations, but would exempt nations such as China and India. Even before the discovery of the connection between the brown cloud and global warming, China and India were ranked as the 2nd and 3rd largest emitters of greenhouse gases. Responding to the new scientific evidence and the subsequent U.N. funding cuts, the U.S. is pressing other industrial nations to fund more satellites that can study the global effects of the cloud. The funding issue will likely be decided at the December 2003 Milan climate change conference. In the meantime, the U.N. has responded to complaints by Asian nations that they are being stigmatized by the cloud by officially changing its name from the “Asian Brown Cloud” to the “Atmospheric Brown Cloud.” -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- James M. Taylor is managing editor of Environment & Climate News. His email address is taylor@heartland.org.

To: tejek who wrote (458487)	9/14/2003 2:47:20 PM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

When was the last time a refinery was built in this country? "Why does that point matter?" It has been over 25 years since a new major refinery was built in the united states.. It is important as you may remember when South America last year went on major strike , I think it Vz. and the oil industry was shut down. This caused major supply problems for U.S. guess why... refineries here depend on that crude since we cannot drill off shore for crude and since we cannot build refineries here,we went and built several ,,,, in South America... Now as to the high prices of natural gas U.S. citizens are paying.. The government has increasingly blocked access to new sources of supply. A moratoria that closed areas off the East and West Coasts and in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico were renewed to 2012, which futher limit access to an estimated 70 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of natural gas resources... While we have domestic resources which are plentiful they are challenging to develop. Currently there is a back log of 2800 applications to drill and litigation is frequently pursued by environmental groups to block development. So we in our homes are paying through the nose for higher prices as a result of litigation by environmentalists.