Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (74742)	9/14/2003 10:41:09 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

My comment wasn't about any act of stimulation. It was about what you and I, I think, agree was excessive and maybe even obsessive concern on the part of our therapist about the unintentional, on his part, arousal of his clients. My comment was about that concern, not the stimulation. I think I am somewhat more sympathetic than you are to his concern. I can understand the ethic that tells him people should be careful in that regard--dress modestly, not strut their stuff, not grab. What I had a problem with was his apparent need to take moral ownership of any arousal that occurred through no impropriety of his own and despite his reasonable precautions. If he conducts a professional massage, then, in my mind, it's not his fault if the client becomes aroused.