SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (8042)9/15/2003 7:38:46 AM
From: KonKilo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793782
 
"Obviously part of the premise of my book is that this is not the most honest administration. So I don’t know what to think of his religiosity. I really can't tell you – but I’m suspicious. I'm very suspicious of the way he uses it. I'm suspicious that it's done for political purposes and that he really isn’t as religious as he makes out to be. But he might be. I don't know." --- Al Franken, not even giving George W. Bush the benefit of the doubt about his religious faith. Is there nothing the Bush-haters won't accuse him of?

Here on planet Earth, this IS giving a man the benefit of the doubt.

Perhaps he should have said he was not sure, more than three times?



To: LindyBill who wrote (8042)9/16/2003 1:48:17 AM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793782
 
Do you suppose Franken would *ever* suggest that he is "suspicious" of the visit by Bill Clinton to an all black church in LA yesterday? That it may have been for "political purposes" or that Bill isn't religious at all?

Wouldn't that be the "honest" thing to do?

M


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News