SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (458854)9/15/2003 9:51:55 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
dailystar.com.lb



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (458854)9/15/2003 10:17:52 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 769667
 
<<...So what, you may say. September 11 happened. We have to respond. I would answer with the following: First of all, understand that these ideas were formulated well before September 11. These officials within the Bush administration did not cobble these concepts together in the aftermath of that attack, but had them waiting before the attack ever came, and used the attack to bulldog these ruinous policies out into the world. That is disturbing on its face. In a moment, I will share with you the most disturbing part of all. But first, this. A reaction to the September 11 attacks, and to the fringe ideology and the perversion of Islam that motivated them, was and is necessary. Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda are thugs, a protection racket that uses terror instead of Tommy guns. Yet they are heroes to many in the Muslim world. They are not heroes because of what they do. They are heroes because of what we do. They win the hearts and minds of people throughout the world not because of their actions, but because their actions are motivated by our actions.

If we are to win this War on Terror, this new Cold War, we will not do so by bombing decrepit countries and slaughtering Muslim civilians. We will not do so by swaggering across the planet and slapping the international community across the face. In this struggle, I look to one of my favorite Red Sox fans, President John F. Kennedy. Kennedy was by no means a foreign policy prince; he pulled crap that would make Richard Perle blush. Yet Kennedy understood something fundamental about the Cold War struggle, from back when that struggle was as hot and dangerous as it ever got, that resonates in roaring truth today. Kennedy understood that to win the Cold War, America did not simply have to defeat the Soviet Union by force of arms, or threaten to be able to do so. America had to give the rest of the world, especially those regions where communism stood a good chance of taking hold, the belief and understanding that we had a better way. We had to convince the world that were right, and righteous, and though we were not perfect by any means, the hope and goodness of what we represented had to be carried to the corners of the world with something besides a bayonet and a bomb. Hatred of America does not take root when America shows its best face. The bastion of immigration that is New York City proves this beyond doubt. We are not perfect, but we can be very good, and bringing this simple truth to the world will defang these thugs, period.

That is the final failure of this administration, and of these boys from the Project for a New American Century. They believe we can defeat terrorism by kicking ass and taking names, by being violent and unilateral, by basically shoving the worst aspects of our country and our system into the international community’s face and demanding, at gunpoint, that they be with us or against us. Machiavelli said, long ago, that given such a choice, the attacked would always choose to be against. Kicking ass in Iraq, while being exposed as liars and bullies, has proven to be the greatest recruiting poster al Qaeda could have ever asked for. We can defeat these thugs if we go after them properly. We can cut off their funds and their ability to bring in people who will die for the privilege of watching you die. But when we do what we have been doing, when we follow the PNAC plan, we create an unending tide of furious humanity that will, in the end, bury us.

You’ve been used, New York. Your pain and woe has been used to justify a course of action formulated years before those Towers fell. The fear caused by those falling Towers has been used against you, on purpose, to drag us all along on a suicide ride that fulfills the extremist dreams of a tiny minority while filling the coffers of defense and petroleum companies that do not, and will never, have your best interests in mind. Those companies exist to serve themselves, and with the rise of PNAC, they have found their champions. At your expense.

I told you, a moment ago, about the most disturbing part. I told you, also, that these PNAC plans were formulated in that ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ report written long before September 11. I didn’t tell you about page 51 of that report. Page 51 of a report that has become the basis for our war in Iraq, and our new and aggressive foreign policy stance. Page 51 of the report that is now the heart and soul and ideology of this government. Page 51, and one simple sentence: "The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

That was written in September of 2000. It is now September of 2003. Now we have the facts. What are we to do with them? It is not enough to know. We must act...>>

truthout.org



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (458854)9/15/2003 11:37:45 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 769667
 
washingtonpost.com
Dean's Next Frontier: The Conference Call

By Brian Faler

Monday, September 15, 2003; Page A04

Having demonstrated his mastery of the Internet, Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean is taking on . . . the conference call?

His campaign announced last week that it will try to break the world record for the largest-ever conference call. That record, according to the good people at the Guinness Book of World Records, was set in September 2000, when 3,310 people rang into a call hosted by the British teen-pop group S Club 7.

Dean will host his call Sept. 29 -- the day before the deadline for reporting third-quarter fundraising totals -- when he will chat with supporters attending house parties for the candidate across the country. Campaign manager Joe Trippi declined to estimate how many people might join the call. But he promised to shatter the world record.

"It's not even going to be close," Trippi said, appropriately enough, in a conference call. The only problem?

"What we don't know is whether we can hit -- do all the calls we want to do -- because we're not sure that, technologically, it's possible," he said.

Stemming the Tide

After limited success on Capitol Hill, an eclectic new political constituency is hoping to use the 2004 presidential campaign to advance cutting-edge research on human stem cells.

The Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research (CAMR)is pressing President Bush and the nine Democrats challenging him to support not only stem cell research but also the more controversial nuclear transfer technology known as therapeutic cloning.

In a letter sent last week, the coalition said it intends to post candidate positions on its Web site and distribute the information to its 80 member groups, which include scientific societies, patient advocacy organizations and the leading biotechnology organization. CAMR hopes its action will put pressure on candidates in early primary states.

"With over 100 million Americans affected by life-threatening diseases and conditions who could benefit from advances in stem cell research, I think this could become a major issue in the campaign," said CAMR President Michael Manganiello.

Scientists say embryonic stem cells hold great potential because they can develop into virtually any type of cell. Researchers are pursuing stem cell treatments for illnesses such as Parkinson's disease, juvenile diabetes and Alzheimer's. Embryonic stem cells are extracted from human embryos that would otherwise be discarded.

Nuclear transfer research involves growing stem cells in a laboratory dish. Scientists say these tailor-made cells could enable patients to be treated using their own unique DNA.

Opponents, including some influential religious conservatives, say both types of research amount to the taking of a potential life. Facing that pressure, Bush announced a political compromise two years ago, permitting federal research only on the 60 cell colonies that existed at the time. But so far, only a dozen cell lines have been usable.

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.) said recently that on the first day of his presidency -- assuming that occurs -- he would rescind Bush's order.

Quotable

"Nobody believed me when I said Hillary Clinton would be the next senator from New York. And nobody believes me now. But Wesley Clark will be the next president of the United States."

-- Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.)

Staff writers Ceci Connolly and David S. Broder contributed to this report.