Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (74866)	9/15/2003 5:44:06 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"Look, if he isn't breaking the law, then there's no reason to call upon freedom of conscience, is there?" You declared him to be a law breaker, (discriminating bigot). I declared him, from the start, to be perfectly within his rights to live according to his "freedom of conscience." He in no way has issues with women or gays that equates to a sexual hang-up as you and solon have accused him. That is your hang-up. He does not believe that they should be denied such services. He has declared that they are not entitled to 'his' therapeutic massage services. If he were an underware tailor it would be no different. Glad you finally found the light switch.