Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard S who wrote (459337)	9/16/2003 12:24:37 AM
From: MSI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Under the theory that the best gov't is a hamstrung gov't, maybe that would be a good thing ... Well we may see a RECALL of the recall. How does California conduct business for 6 months with no decision about who is going to be Governor?

To: Richard S who wrote (459337)	9/16/2003 12:49:15 AM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

"Yes, I agree, the Supreme Court should have never intervened in Bush vs. Gore" That just shows that you are a Gore supporter who would take a "win" any way you could (just as Gore tried to do). The Supreme Court got involved because the Gore team attempted to STEAL the election, and would have with their allies in the FL Supreme Court had the USSC not injected some sanity in the situation. I am relatively sure that you cannot even explain why the Gore camp deserved a recount after the mandatory recount (by Florida law) that Bush won. NOBODY on this sight that holds your dishonest (or uninformed) position has been able to. Care to try?