SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (8193)9/16/2003 8:54:20 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793782
 
He ran the editorial page and had complete control.


Must have been back before the NYT bought it out.



To: Bill who wrote (8193)9/16/2003 9:01:30 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793782
 
I post a lot of Media coverage, because they control the material we use to form our opinions. This changeover at CNN is a fascinating story to follow. For all the "Yak,Yak," about better news coverage, they need excitement to raise the ratings. Eason Jordan just lost a lot of power.



September 16, 2003
General Manager Is Replaced in a Reorganization at CNN
By JIM RUTENBERG - NEW YORK TIMES


Trailing in the ratings behind the Fox News Channel, CNN announced a reorganization yesterday meant to help it produce more compelling news programs.

The changes include a management reshuffling in which Teya Ryan, the general manager of CNN's domestic network, will step down. She is to be succeeded by a Viacom executive, Princell Hair, whose main experience has been in local television news.

The main change, said Jim Walton, CNN's president, is a fundamental shift in the way CNN collects its news.

The network has traditionally relied on a central news-gathering operation that made the main decisions on what to cover for all of CNN. Producers for the various CNN networks and programs had to pick reports from among its daily offerings — even if they did not quite suit their program plans.

Now that news operation, formerly under CNN's chief news executive, Eason Jordan, is to be decentralized, freeing individual producers and network executives to decide which news events they want to cover.

Under the new structure Mr. Jordan, who has spent his career at the network, will retain his chief news executive title. He will continue to focus on securing CNN's access in foreign countries, executives said, while also developing projects and possibly appearing sometimes on television.

Ms. Ryan is known within the network for having a stern management style that sometimes puts her at fierce odds with some producers. Ms. Ryan said if she comes off as stern it was because, "I have a strong vision and I'm also a producer."

Mr. Walton said in a conference call with reporters yesterday that the new structure was less suited to Ms. Ryan's skills, which fall more on the side of the production of programs than they do on the managing of news resources.

"It was pretty clear to me that we needed to bring somebody in who had the ability to lead and motivate and manage," he said, adding that given Ms. Ryan's passion for production "We agreed that it would probably be best to look to change."

But the naming of her successor, Mr. Hair, surprised competing news executives because he is mostly unknown and relatively young at 36.

He was most recently the vice president in charge of news for Viacom's 39 stations. Before that he was news director at KCBS-TV in Los Angeles, WBAL-TV in Baltimore and WMAQ-TV in Chicago.

Mr. Walton said local news was a good training ground for Mr. Hair because, like cable news, it is highly competitive, requires the management of brand-name talent and produces many hours of newscasts daily.

Some reporters on the conference call asked yesterday whether Mr. Hair would bring to CNN all that local news is known for — sensational news coverage, promotion and ratings stunts.

Mr. Hair said he would not.

"What local news does, local news does," he said. "This is a different animal."

Mr. Hair did not exactly exalt his old stomping grounds, saying, "My background is local news, but I'm a journalist at heart."

nytimes.com



To: Bill who wrote (8193)9/16/2003 9:57:20 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793782
 
This Blog from "The New Republic" makes "moose-meat" out of Charlie.

WHAT A RELIEF THIS GUY NO LONGER CARRIES A BADGE: Today is the publication day for Charles Moose's as-told-to insta-book about the Washington sniper shootings. The more we learn about Moose, the happier I am that he no longer runs the police department of Montgomery County, Maryland, where I live.

First, Moose is already yakking it up like mad about the snipers--"Dateline NBC" last night--in the rush to market his book. But the accused haven't been tried yet. Either Moose will only say things so vague as to be meaningless, or he'll make specific comments on the case, potentially prejudicing jurors and raising the terrifying prospect he could slip something that allows the guilty to get off. What does he care about most, justice or money?

Wait, we already know--money. In an August story that received surprisingly little attention, The Washington Post revealed last December, just after Moose became a celebrity, he essentially blackmailed Marriott, which has a division headquarters in Montgomery County, into giving him around $200,000. (The Post story built on an initial report on the mainly conservative web site WorldNetDaily.com.) After the sniper attacks ended, Moose and his wife took a well-earned vacation at Marriott's Ihilani resort in Hawaii. While Moose was wandering the grounds, a security guard asked to see his room key as proof he was a registered guest. Moose claims this was racism, that he was suspected because he is African American. But the Ihilani's claim to fame is a spectacular private beach, pictured here. Security personnel at this hotel routinely ask to see room keys, to keep the un-registered out of the facility. If security wasn't keeping the riffraff off the private beach, the resort would not have been worth what Moose was paying to stay there.

Shortly after returning from Hawaii, the Post asserted, Moose wrote a letter to Marriott threatening to generate bad publicity for the company unless it gave him $200,000. This was done while Moose was still police chief of the county; Moose was threatening to harm a company he had the power to harass in many ways. That's blackmail. If Moose really was the victim of racism, he should use his First Amendment rights to say so. But justice wasn't on his mind, money was. To prevent bad press, Marriott settled for an amount believed to be slightly less than $200,000, and the company signed a confidentiality agreement, forbidding it from talking about the incident or accusing Moose of being an extortionist. Moose, in turn, is currently trying to block Montgomery County from revealing the payment on his final county-required financial disclosure form.

It turns out that when Moose was police chief of Portland, Oregon, his wife Sandy Herman Moose, who worked for the police department, accused another department employee of sexual harassment. Maybe this really happened, though it seems hard to believe anyone in a police department would be so incredibly stupid as to mess with the chief's wife. The Mooses received an undisclosed amount of money, in return for not making public accusations against Portland. Word is the city government of Portland was very happy in 1999 when Moose announced he was leaving for the Maryland job. Probably Portland never told Montgomery County recruiters what Moose was really like, hoping the county would take a problem off the city's hands.

Racism persists in the United States; you couldn't be a black man working as a cop without encountering some ugly sentiment. But being asked to show your room key as you relax at a luxury resort--that's the new Edmund Pettus Bridge?

And why, with Charles Moose enough of a story for the cable news universe to broadcast hundreds of hours of his face, has his sideline as an extortionist not been widely reported? Even the Post buried its own story in the Metro section, rather than on the front page. Imagine the media flap there would have been if, say, Los Angeles police chief William Bratton, who's white, was writing to Hollywood companies threatening to create bad publicity for them unless he was given secret payments.

From here it looks like Moose is benefiting from reverse racism, rather than suffering from the standard kind: Because he's black, he's being held to a lower standard. I think I'll write a letter to the national media, threatening to accuse them of reverse racism unless they give me $200,000.

tnr.com